66-10 Attachment

Revaluation Proposal Evaluation Evaluated by: Joseph Antonucel, Tax Collactor Edward J, Coleman, Comptroller Anne DeSantis, Purchasing Agent Kevin Diiton, Tax Asseasor John Sayers, Business Administrator “Cerified ‘Appraisal Realty Appralsat| Valuations Systems [Proposal Amount $985,000.00 | $1,074,120.00 | $1,143,400.00 yes | NO | yes | NO | YES | NQ Mandatory Proposal Check Lists (Genificate/Consant of Suraly form * ea x [Non-collusian affidavit x x x Affirmative Action Forms: x x x Mandatory EO Notice x x x [Staininent of Corporate oevncrship_ x x x Sialemortt of vendor's quefiicalions x x x [Lint of current reval projects & thn average clans 2 x x x aseecsed valve. ‘Lint of raval proposals submitted in last 6 montis x x x Coptes of Financlel Statemants. x x x [NJ Buslnoss Ropistralion Ceriicete, x x x [Pesfensional Services Entity Fern Xx x x [Pay-t0- Play” Current Annual Djgclogure Statemiant x x x [Datalind prajact work schedule x x x [Statement of IRigation history: x x x enemies meet I a) Cz T Cx ‘echnical Criteria: 41 % Welaht Wel % Welsiit ftinderalands Seopa & rales a id @ ‘7 experience uttizing Vial CAMA System a 7 10 [Compinieness & responshantse of proposal 0 7 0 requirements . [Documentation of past perfomance 10, 40 10 Innovative technology & Techniques EI F 70 Description of PR procrem 19 10 40, informal Laxpayer hearlng process: 10. 10 19. [Total Technical Criteria Welght: [33.71% 34.86% 40.00% Managerivant Criteria: 30% raises ‘managerent plan 5 o 10 [History Experiance & Reliabil Ka Cl 2 [Review of Company's Wor aie ‘Antersctive?) EB 7 10 Facilites, Equioment, Tecinotogy cc 19 40 Porsonnel (qualifiertions. quantity avaliable) rd 5 10 [Tets! Management Criterta Welght: 2oao% [| 18.00% | 29.40% Gost Criteria: 30° [Cost of Services 10 EI s |Assurances of performenca 40 10 10 Hendor's financial stability & strengin, 6 bE 19 [Total Cost Criteria Weight [28.00% “[ 2a00% | 26.00% | Date/ February 3. 2010 X= Moots Criterta “RECEIVED TIME MAR 4. 11:49AM