00 Cover Letter

STONEFIELD Municipal Response Letter Proposed Renovation & Addition West Orange, New Jersey September 1, 2022 Page | 5 14. As a condition of any approval granted by the Board, it is our recommendation that the Applicant be required to consolidate the three (3) existing lots. Prior to recording, a copy of the proposed Deed of Consolidation must be submitted to the Board for review and approval by the Board Attorney and our office. In addition, the proposed lot number for the consolidated parcel must be approved in writing by the West Orange Tax Assessor. Acknowledged. C. Lighting Comments: 1. The Applicant requires a waiver from Section 25-14.2 as the proposed parking lot lighting is under the 2.0 footcandles required. However, we note that the proposed lighting meets IES (Illuminating Engineering Society) standards and appears to be sufficient as proposed. Acknowledged. 2. It remains for the plans to be revised to provide isolux pattern details including a scale and graph for Fixture B. The isolux pattern details for Fixture B has been added to the Construction Details (Sheet C-12, Detail #2) 3. It remains for the plans to be revised to provide the manufacturer's catalog cut and ordering information for the proposed light pole. Also, provide the color and finish for the proposed pole. The cut sheet for the proposed light pole will be provided in advance of construction. 4. It remains for the plans to be revised to indicate timers and hours of operation for the proposed light fixtures. Testimony will be provided regarding the proposed hours of operation of the proposed light fixtures. D. Landscaping Comments: 1. In accordance with Section 25-11.3b, a twenty (20) feet wide buffer strip planted as indicated above is to be provided along the east property line; whereas the Applicant has provided a buffer strip with a width of 5.1 feet. Acknowledged. The following is an itemized response to the comments contained within the CME Associates Review Email dated August 18, 2022. For the sake of brevity, any comments that are statements of fact or have been previously addressed are not included in the response below: 1. The passenger car and the F-550 truck turning movements appear to be acceptable. Acknowledged. 2. The F-550 truck with trailer turning movements will be difficult as it requires multiple back and forth movements in order to position the trailer in a

ements appear to be acceptable. Acknowledged. 2. The F-550 truck with trailer turning movements will be difficult as it requires multiple back and forth movements in order to position the trailer in a parking space. The turning movements only work if the 2 parking spaces in front of the shed are vacant and available for use by the F-550 truck. The F-550 with trailer turning movements have been revised per the updated parking layout.