Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Feb 1, 2023

2022 08 05 Traffic Impact and Parking Assessment

Preserved file SHA-2561219dcebe8adc327d65983b0e99094fdde8c43b9fa71b8b0d10cdcc7e22f8251

Indexed text · page 1

Show all pages
Page 1

www.dynamictraffic.com Lake Como, NJ • Chester, NJ • Toms River, NJ • Newark, NJ • Newtown, PA • Philadelphia, PA Bethlehem, PA • Allen, TX • Houston, TX • Austin, TX • Delray Beach, FL • Annapolis, MD Dynamic Traffic, LLC 1904 Main Street Lake Como, NJ T. 732.681.0760 August 5, 2022 Via FedEx Township of West Orange Planning Board 66 Main Street West Orange, NJ 07052 Attn: Planning Board Secretary Re: Traffic Impact and Parking Assessment Proposed Residential Subdivision Block 80.03 – Lots 21 & 10 2 & 10 Ridge Road West Orange Township, Essex County, NJ DT # 4266-99-001T Dear Planning Board Members: Dynamic Traffic has prepared the following assessment to determine the traffic impact and adequacy of access, circulation, and parking associated with the proposed single-family residential subdivision of a site located on the corner of Mount Pleasant Avenue (CR 577) and Ridge Road in the Township of West Orange, Essex County, New Jersey. The site is designated as Block 80.03 – Lots 21 and 10 on the Township of West Orange Tax Maps. The site is currently undeveloped and access is not provided. It is proposed to construct four (4) single-family dwelling units (The Project) on the subject property. Access to the site is proposed via four (4) driveways, one (1) for each single-family home. This assessment documents the methodology, analyses, findings and conclusions of our study and includes:  A detailed field inspection was conducted to obtain an inventory of existing roadway geometry, traffic control, and location and geometry of existing driveways and intersections.  Projections of traffic to be generated by The Project were prepared utilizing trip generation data as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.  The proposed site driveways were inspected for adequacy of geometric design, spacing and/or alignment to streets and driveways on the opposite side of the street, relationship to other driveways adjacent to the development, and conformance with accepted design standards.  The parking supply was assessed based on accepted design standards and demand experienced at similar developments.

File revisions (1)