V3 RESUBMISSION Response to Township Engineers Review 1 Dated November 3 2022

9 36. Sheet SP-19 includes a Typical Sign Detail. Therefore, the plans must be revised to identify where each type of sign is proposed. PETRY RESPONSE: The Sign Detail has been revised to only show the signs that are proposed (See Sheet SP-19). 37. Sheet SP-20 includes a Doghouse Structure detail. Therefore, the plans must be revised to identify the locations where Doghouse Structures are proposed. PETRY RESPONSE: The doghouse structure detail is now noted as “if required” (See Sheet SP-20). 38. Sheet SP-20 includes a Type "E" Inlet Detail. Therefore, the plans must be revised to identify the locations where Type "E" Inlets are proposed. PETRY RESPONSE: The Type “E” Inlet Detail has been removed from the plans. 39. The Basin #1A — OS #5-7 detail on sheet SP-20 shows that it will be installed within a paved area whereas sheet SP-6 shows no pavement in the area. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: Basin #1A is proposed within a parking lot, therefore the detail is correct. 40. The elevations of the 4"x 7" orifice, the 6" x 18" orifice and the 4' weir shown on the Basin #1B — OS #8-4 detail on sheet SP-20 do not agree with the elevations shown on the Pond No. 3 — Basin #1B Pond Report in the Stormwater Management Report. PETRY RESPONSE: The orifice elevations on the outlet structure details have been revised to match the Pond Report.