V4 06 Response to Board Engineers Review 2 1 26 2023

3 PETRY RESPONSE: The plans have been revised to show that all the required EV spaces that need to be installed by the 3 year mark are shown within the surface parking lots. The Remaining EV spaces and the spaces within the parking level will be installed by the 6 year mark. The plans have been revised to note this. (See SP-3) 5. Sheet SP-3 must be revised to dimension the width of the sidewalks in the interior courtyard area. PETRY RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised to dimension the sidewalk widths in the courtyard areas. (See Sheet SP-3). 6. It shows on sheet SP-3 that the southerly handicap parking space in the parking lot at the northeast corner of the site will not be electric vehicle ready. However, this parking space includes a callout which indicates that the electric vehicle station will be installed within 6 years of C.O. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The site plan has been revised to remove the electric vehicle callout for the southerly handicap space. (See Sheet SP-3). 7. The Basin #2 callout on sheet SP-4 states that the rim elevation will be at elevation 419.00 whereas the callout for OS #5-6A shows a rim elevation of 418.00. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The site plans have been revised to differentiate between the top of the basin and the grate of the outlet structure. (See Sheet SP- 4). The grate of the outlet structure has intentionally been set 1 foot below the top of the basin, acting as a 4’ weir. 8. The Basin #3 callout on sheet SP-4 states that the rim elevation will be at elevation 421.00 whereas the callout for OS #1-9 shows a rim elevation of 420.00. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The site plans have been revised to differentiate between the top of the basin and the grate of the outlet structure. (See Sheet SP- 4). The grate of the outlet structure has intentionally been set 1 foot below the top of the basin, acting as a 4’ weir.