Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Feb 9, 2023

V4 06 Response to Board Engineers Review 2 1 26 2023

Preserved file SHA-2567bfc402fe296a4bad8e19f879b231737b83159b9b84647187d1c3bc553a885d3

Indexed text · page 4

Show all pages
Page 4

4 9. MH #8-1 must be shown on the profile on sheet SP-10. PETRY RESPONSE: MH #8-1 is now shown on the profile (See Sheet SP-10.) 10. The Basin #1B — OS #8-5 detail on sheet SP-21 shows that it will be installed within a paved area whereas sheet SP-6 shows no pavement in the area. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The detail has been revised to show that OS #8-5 will not be within a pavement area. (See Sheet SP-21). 11. Section A-A on the Basin #1A — OS #5-7 detail on sheet SP-21 shows that the grate will be at elevation 423.30 whereas Section B-B it shows that the grate will be at elevation 423.32. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The detail has been revised to show the correct rim rim elevation of 423.32. 12. Section A-A on the Basin #2 — OS #5-6A detail on sheet SP-21 shows that the orifices are to be installed in the exterior wall of the structure which is incorrect. Therefore, the detail must be revised to show the correct installation of the orifices. PETRY RESPONSE: The orifices are shown on the exterior of the wall within the surface basin. This is typical of an outlet structure within a surface basin. 13. Section A-A on the Basin #3 — OS #1-9 detail on sheet SP-21 shows that the orifices are to be installed in the exterior wall of the structure which is incorrect. Therefore, the detail must be revised to show the correct installation of the orifices. PETRY RESPONSE: The orifices are shown on the exterior of the wall within the surface basin. This is typical of an outlet structure within a surface basin.

File revisions (1)