Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Feb 9, 2023

V4 06 Response to Board Engineers Review 2 1 26 2023

Preserved file SHA-2567bfc402fe296a4bad8e19f879b231737b83159b9b84647187d1c3bc553a885d3

Indexed text · page 8

Show all pages
Page 8

8 9. Revise the plans to provide rigid, plastic, open mesh trunk guards for all deciduous trees, to protect form the irreparable damage from buck rub. KDA RESPONSE: The tree planting details have been revised to specify trunk guards for all deciduous trees. 10. Revise the plans to indicate the proposed disposition for all open areas, such as lawn, stone, mulch, etc., to prevent confusion during construction. KDA RESPONSE: The plans have been revised to label All open areas with the materials specified for each location. D. LIGHTING COMMENTS 1. Revise the plans to provide the concrete strength for proposed light pole foundation details on sheet SP-17. Staff recommends a strength of 4,500 PSI. PETRY RESPONSE: The light pole foundation details have been revised to indicate a concrete strength of 4,500 PSI (See Sheet SP-17). 2. Revise the plans to indicate proposed timers and hours of operation. Also, indicate proposed color and finish for all fixtures and poles. PETRY RESPONSE: The lighting plans has been revised to include the existing and proposed times of operation for lighting. Additionally, a note has been added to the plans which shows that the proposed color of the fixtures is bronze. (See Sheet SP-16 Lighting Notes #1-3.) 3. Revise the plans to provide isolux pattern details with a scale and graph to correspond with the proposed fixtures. Also, provide the manufacturer's catalog cuts and ordering information for the proposed light poles, for further review. PETRY RESPONSE: The requested isolux patterns, and cut sheets for the poles have been attached to this letter.

File revisions (1)