9 19 24 West Orange BOA ZB 24 06 PSEG Full size

Page 105 1 proposed development exacerbate that or any other 2 pre-existing nonconformity in your opinion? 3 THE WITNESS: No, it does not. 4 MR. WILLIAMS: Thank you. 5 THE WITNESS: Actually, specifically we are 6 getting rid of a brick shed. So if that is considered 7 a building, and if that is considered the 8 nonconformity, that shed will be removed. It is brick. 9 MR. WILLIAMS: Thank you. 10 THE WITNESS: And that is on the site plan 11 that is presented. 12 MR. WILLIAMS: Okay. Thank you. 13 THE WITNESS: Two meetings ago. 14 MR. WILLIAMS: Okay. I'm fairly 15 comfortable that I heard and noted correctly the proofs 16 for the D-2, which is the expansion of a nonconforming 17 use, and you spoke about the use being inherently 18 beneficial. You went through the first and second 19 prong of the negative criteria. Of course, you 20 mentioned the purposes of zoning. 21 For the D-6 Variance could you just provide 22 a bit of context about the standards for this Board's 23 review of a D-6 Variance? 24 THE WITNESS: I believe it would be 25 essentially equivalent to what I already testified