9 19 24 West Orange BOA ZB 24 06 PSEG Full size

Page 107 1 wasn't sure if you gave context for those. In other 2 words, was it a C-1 standard you were applying or a 3 C-2? 4 THE WITNESS: For the bulk variance for 5 setback that would be a C-1, but I'm essentially 6 arguing a C-2. 7 MR. WILLIAMS: And your argument is that 8 the tradeoffs, the benefits outweigh the detriments? 9 THE WITNESS: Yes. 10 MR. WILLIAMS: Did I hear that -- 11 THE WITNESS: Yes. 12 MR. WILLIAMS: And then lot coverage, the 13 proof there was -- 14 THE WITNESS: Was also the benefits 15 outweigh the detriments. 16 MR. WILLIAMS: And that's based on in part 17 the civil engineering testimony? 18 THE WITNESS: Yes, it is. 19 MR. WILLIAMS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I 20 think that concludes my questions for now. 21 CHAIRMAN NEUER: Thank you so much, Mr. 22 Williams, for being so well prepared. Mr. Hess? 23 MR. HESS: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have 24 no questions of this witness. 25 CHAIRMAN NEUER: Thank you so very much.