Supporting Documentation · Oct 9, 2024
8 7 2024 WO PB Draft Minutes
2a6700483a09b0ae1a250e7735d584e7880239f4d17160f7118426572f7a9bf0Indexed text · page 4
Show all pages4 The architect said that the planner will discuss the types of uses at the retail spaces. • Chairman Bagoff asked if there will be a bathroom in the retail space. The architect said that it is not part of the current plans, but there certainly will be a bathroom in the retail space. • Chairman Bagoff asked what is the size of an ADA compliant bathroom. The architect said it is about 7 1/2 by 6 feet. PROFESSIONALS QUESTIONS • Mr. Haizel asked is there any reason why the trash room was proposed in the middle of the commercial space and the entry to the building. The architect said it does have to do with connecting to the floors above it. It's very common that the trash shoots are generally near the elevator and the stairs. • Mr. Hess asked if the trash collection will be done in Park Drive N. The architect said that the trash and recycling will be picked up by a private hauler the collection vehicle will pull up along Main Street. The attendee will roll out the dumpsters for collection, once the refuse collection is complete, the collection vehicle will continue forward along Main St., no turnaround required. Frequency of collection will be two times per week which is pretty standard for multifamily apartment building of this size. • Mr. Hess asked will there be any audible components on the warning lights. The architect said she does not recall if the unit has audio, but if it is required the applicant will comply. PUBLIC QUESTIONS • Susan Lenczyk at 234 Eagle Rock Avenue asked why are we showing trees and not the adjacent building on the plans. Ms. Klimm said that it's an artistic choice to show around the building. • Ms. Adams at Park Drive South asked how will drivers on Main Street be able to see the warning light especially if they're going northbound on Main Street turning on to park Dr. N. The architect said the light is to warn pedestrians that a vehicle is exiting or entering. • Ms. Adams asked if the warning lights will be loud enough that a person walking by will hear it. Ms. Klimm said but it will not be loud enough to disturb the neighbors. There are noise ordinances in effect throughout the Township as well as state requirements and any noise emitted from this site, we'll need to comply at the property lines with those requirements. • Jeanine Scholz at main Street asked if the height is compliant with the requirement. Ms. Klimm answered in the
ted from this site, we'll need to comply at the property lines with those requirements. • Jeanine Scholz at main Street asked if the height is compliant with the requirement. Ms. Klimm answered in the affirmative. PRESENTATION • The civil engineer Ali Rangwala entered on the record, he was sworn under oath and his credential were accepted by the board. • The plans presented were last revised on May 16, 2024 and there have been no change. • The south setback is 5.22 feet as as the minimum, going up to 5.42 on the west side, on the north west side set back is 8.16, which goes all the way up to 12.32. On the north side 13 feet throughout and then on the east side around 11 1/2 on the on the North East side going down it's about the same on the South. • The total impervious surface in existing was 3,546 square feet and in the proposed condition it is 10,142 square feet. • All the slopes are compliant and are constructed to be ADA compliant. • There is no existing storm water management system. In the proposed condition what
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
2a6700483a09118,094 bytes