Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Nov 6, 2024

23 1345 004 PB24 15 31 35 Harrison Avenue Engineering Review

Preserved file SHA-25617a524da738aac1a1ef0634284da213205b3c1d98ffa2f038764a1e04d09b2ea

Indexed text · page 3

Show all pages
Page 3

Matrix New World Engineering, Land Surveying and Landscape Architecture, PC 26 Columbia Turnpike Florham Park, NJ 07932 973.240.1800 F: 973.240.1818 www.mnwe.com 3 23-1345-004 - PB24-15 (31-35 Harrison Avenue) the driveway itself and an area of asphalt. The Applicant shall provide testimony as to the intention to remove, demolish, or otherwise modify any existing exterior site elements for the proposed addition. 3. Site Plan 3.1 The Applicant shall provide testimony regarding the existing site conditions, proposed improvements, and conformance with applicable ordinances and regulations. 3.2 The existing site is described as including one (1) parking space. The exact location of this parking space is not indicated in the survey or Proposed Site Plan. The Applicant shall clarify the location of this parking space. 3.3 The plans show a proposed overhead door entrance on the left side for deliveries. However, the side yard does not provide enough space for turning/maneuvering especially for delivery trucks which would likely only be able to back in and out. Ordinance section § 25-12.1 f states “All parking areas shall be so designed that vehicles are not compelled to back directly onto a public right-of-way.” The Applicant shall provide testimony on the functionality of the driveway/parking area. 3.4 The Applicant shall confirm compliance with all applicable ADA Standards for Accessible Design, and with ADA Title II and Title III regulations. 3.5 Any proposed parking spaces would appear to be less than five (5) feet from the adjacent property line. As per Ordinance §25-8.1 (Setbacks of Accessory Uses), “In any district no accessory structure, building, storage area, off-street parking area or truck loading space shall be permitted within five feet of a property line.” Accordingly, the plan shall be revised to demonstrate compliance therewith or request a variance for the same. Matrix defers to the Board Planner for further planning review. 3.6 The Applicant shall provide testimony regarding the intention to install any ground signage, including but not limited to, monument signage, exterior building signage, sign boards, etc. 3.7 The southwest, northwest, and northeast property lines do not appear to be fenced, although a wire fence appears in the site survey along the southwest property line. The Applicant shall and indicate whether any fencing will be

Page 3

nd northeast property lines do not appear to be fenced, although a wire fence appears in the site survey along the southwest property line. The Applicant shall and indicate whether any fencing will be installed and conformance with the applicable fencing standards. 3.8 The topographic survey depicts two window walls on the rear of the building, but no cellar egress. The architectural plans indicate that one of these window walls will be

File revisions (1)