Supporting Documentation · Dec 12, 2024
Transcript 10 17 24 WO BOA ZB 24 06 PSEG Full size
2b801ed8f745c34df5de364c8782befb399b5841fa896cd5300cc2f08cbd9521Indexed text · page 40
Show all pagesPage 40 1 proposed. We will make that change. 2 MS. PORTER: And just to go back to Mr. 3 Kipp's September 9th report that he had provided, 4 that report specifically indicated that he reviewed 5 and found everything presented on both the tree plan 6 which is the plan that you're showing on the screen 7 today, as well as the tree replacement plan were 8 consistent with the tree ordinance, is that correct? 9 MR. FUTEY: That's correct. It included 10 the entire landscape package, the tree removal plan, 11 and also the proposed plan as well. 12 MS. PORTER: Okay. And did he also, as 13 part of that review, review the planting list? 14 MR. FUTEY: Yes. 15 MS. PORTER: And did he find in connection 16 with his review that it was consistent with using 17 native plants and pollinator friendly species? 18 MR. FUTEY: He did. 19 MS. PORTER: And did he note as part of 20 his September 5th review, that everything in his 21 prior review, from his prior report was specifically 22 addressed with the updated plan? 23 MR. FUTEY: Yes, that's correct, he did. 24 MS. PORTER: And now as part of the 25 updated plans in between the first report you
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
2b801ed8f745432,571 bytes