Supporting Documentation · Dec 12, 2024
Transcript 10 17 24 WO BOA ZB 24 06 PSEG Full size
2b801ed8f745c34df5de364c8782befb399b5841fa896cd5300cc2f08cbd9521Indexed text · page 41
Show all pagesPage 41 1 received from Mr. Kipp, which I believe was in 2 August, and the second report which we were just 3 discussing on September 6th, what did PSE&G do -- 4 CHAIRMAN NEUER: At one point you said 5 September 9th, was it the 6th or the 9th? 6 MS. PORTER: I'm sorry, September 6th, 7 9/6/24. 8 CHAIRMAN NEUER: Thank you. Please repeat 9 the question, I don't think the witness remembered. 10 MR. FUTEY: Yeah, I'm sorry, I didn't 11 hear the question. 12 MS. PORTER: Oh, sure. So, in between Mr. 13 Kipp's initial review and his second review letter 14 that was issued on September 6th, what, if any 15 changes were made specific to the tree removal or 16 tree replacement plan? Were any additional trees 17 preserved in that time period? 18 MR. FUTEY: Not in that time period, no, 19 we did previous to that. The application was 20 submitted back in May under the old tree ordinance. 21 MS. PORTER: Okay. 22 MR. FUTEY: After that time and with the 23 new tree ordinance that was adopted in June, we did 24 go back at that point in time and we did reevaluate 25 the trees and we did save effectively 17 trees from
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
2b801ed8f745432,571 bytes