470 Eagle TIS 6 4 24

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Popeye’s & Fast Food Restaurant – West Orange Table 4 Trip Generation Considering Passby Traffic AM PSH PM PSH SAT PSH Land Use Trip Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 2,391 SF Popeye’s Total 55 52 107 41 38 79 67 65 132 Fast Food Restaurant Passby 28 26 54 23 20 43 25 24 49 with Drive-Thru New (Primary) 27 26 53 18 18 36 42 41 83 3,797 SF IHOP Total 20 16 36 21 13 34 21 21 42 High-Turnover Sit Passby - - - 9 6 15 - - - Down Restaurant New (Primary) 20 16 36 12 7 19 21 21 42 Total 75 68 143 62 51 113 88 86 174 Total Passby 28 26 54 32 26 58 25 24 49 New (Primary) 47 42 89 30 25 55 63 62 125 As mentioned previously, the site is currently developed with a vacated restaurant which has trip generation potential if re-occupied. Therefore, ITE data for LUC 932 was utilized to project the trip generation associated with the potential re-occupation of the existing use. The following Table 5 compares the trips associated with the proposed use to the trip generation potential of the site. Table 5 Trip Generation Comparison AM PSH PM PSH SAT PSH Land Use Trip Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total

PM PSH SAT PSH Land Use Trip Type In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Total 32 27 59 34 22 56 35 34 69 Existing 6,190 SF Passby - - - 15 9 24 - - - Restaurant New (Primary) 32 27 59 19 13 32 35 34 69 Proposed Popeye’s Total 75 68 143 62 51 113 88 86 174 and IHOP Passby 28 26 54 32 26 58 25 24 49 Restaurants New (Primary) 47 42 89 30 25 55 63 62 125 Total +43 +41 +84 +28 +29 +57 +53 +52 +105 Difference Passby +28 +26 +54 +17 +17 +34 +25 +24 +49 New (Primary) +15 +15 +30 +11 +12 +23 +28 +28 +56 As shown in Table 4 above, it is anticipated that 30 additional trips during the weekday morning peak hour, 23 additional trips during the weekday evening peak hour and 56 additional trips during the Saturday midday peak hour are anticipated to access the site that are considered “new” to the adjacent roadway network with the proposed redevelopment compared to the potential reoccupation of the site. However, no credit was taken for the potential use of the site and all trip generation was considered an increase over vacant land. This accounts for a “worst case scenario” from a traffic impact perspective. Page 6