Supporting Documentation · Jan 16, 2025
12 12 24 PSEG West Orange BOA ZB 24 06 PSEG 35 Mt Pleasant Ave Full Size
9bbf98ce9f6194c037e9c0b3ee303fc447eb8f04d22b926d170a53a4262b53e0Indexed text · page 103
Show all pagesPage 103 1 allowed -- I did not overrule the objection. 2 I am allowing the question to go 3 forward, subject to the objection. 4 MR. TURTELTAUB: Thank you. 5 BY MR. TURTELTAUB: 6 Q. And, Mr. Kipp -- excuse me, Mr. Linson, 7 your understanding of what -- what the compliance was 8 that Mr. Kipp was referring to in his report? 9 A. Yes. You know, I believe it's very 10 unusual for a New Jersey licensed tree expert to have 11 a vastly different opinion from another New Jersey 12 licensed tree expert. 13 I trust Mr. Kipp's judgment in 14 enforcing the ordinance. I don't know whether he 15 considered the fact that a tree application could be 16 denied from the standpoint that it's not preserving 17 the maximum possible number of trees and the 18 development of a site. 19 I know that and I trust that Mr. Kipp's 20 analysis on the replacement requirement is accurate. 21 I just don't know that he had the -- had the thought 22 that it could be denied from the fact that not -- not 23 all possible trees could be saved by changing -- I 24 don't know whether he -- he saw the video or was 25 privy to the engineering reports on why the
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
9bbf98ce9f61680,485 bytes