24 03 17 MPB Realty Planning Review 2

West Orange Zoning Board March 17, 2025 Re: MPB Realty (Popeyes & IHOP) Our File No. WRZ0153.V01 Planning Review #2 Page 6 S:\West Orange\Zoning Board\VWRZ0153.01 - MPB Realty, LLC\24-03-17 MPB Realty - Planning Review 2.docx One freestanding sign is permitted with a max height of 16 feet and a maximum sign area of 50 square feet. • One freestanding sign is proposed, at a height of 16 feet and sign area of 50 s.f. 4. Variances & Waivers Required It appears that the following conditions are not in compliance with the Township’s land development regulations and may require variance or design waiver relief from the Board to permit the project as proposed: Variances: a. §25-24.2.b.2(i) Conditional Use – The following conditional use standards are not met. These are d-3 conditional use variances: 1) The Popeyes will be located within 500 feet of the lot that contains another fast food restaurant. 2) The Popeyes will be located within 1,000 feet of a residential district. 3) The Popeyes has less than 200 feet of frontage on a corner lot. 4) An entrance driveway will be located less than 100 feet from an intersection. b. §25-Attachment 3 Impervious Cover – The maximum permitted impervious cover of 60% will be exceeded. 75.7% is proposed. c. §25-8.1.a Accessory Uses – No accessory structures or uses are permitted in a front or side yard, where the parking lot is proposed within the front yard. d. §25-8.1.b Accessory Structures – Accessory structures are required to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from any property line, where the garbage dumpster will be 9.4 feet from the rear property line. The garbage dumpsters are now proposed to be 14 feet from the eastern property line and 28.9 feet from the southern property line. e. §25-11.3.a Buffer – A buffer of at least 50 feet in width is required where a non-residential use abuts a residential use in a residential district. A buffer of 8.8 feet is proposed along the southern boundary line. However, it is not clear whether or not this applies, as it appears that the two residential properties immediately to the south are also located in the B-2 district and not in a residential district.