Supporting Documentation · Apr 17, 2025
TFE 81 Northfield Interpretation Request Application Digital Copy 1142416095411
c5b2b9c2abc1463be709b3cffabbea46a9d66e1eec4c89c1d38b589b3dd8d0ebIndexed text · page 18
Show all pagesWATERS, MCPHERSON, MCNEILL Diana Chandler-Zimmermann A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION November 4, 2024 Page 8 Conclusion NAR therefore respectfully asks the Zoning Board of Adjustment to find and conclude that the parking of a small number of vehicles, including parking such vehicles overnight, by a business that maintains permitted office space at a site in the OB-1 Zone, and which vehicles are directly used in said business’ day to day operations, constitutes permitted required accessory parking as permitted under the Ordinance.. The use is not in conflict with and in line with to other nearby uses. There is nothing in the Ordinance that would require or would justify prohibition of the aforementioned parking use. Relevant case law further supports interpretation of the Ordinance in favor of such proposed use. Very truly yours, WATERS, McPHERSON, MeNEILL, P.C. By: V4. es M. Spdnarkel Enclosures Cc: Applicant (via e-mail w/encl.) Zoning Official (via U.S. mail w/encl.) Board Attorney (via U.S. mail w/encl.) #1606835v1
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
c5b2b9c2abc12,122,497 bytes