Supporting Documentation · Jun 4, 2025
2 12 25 WO PB Draft Minutes
d62a37b8221b1fb0c7140f3126959e3f572c8d244a1a0e70ef0c3bcebcafe176Indexed text · page 12
Show all pages12 • Mr. Sweeny asked is that plan in your view complete and covering all the issues of storm water management and drainage applicable to the site. Mr. Cokeley said yes. • Mr. Sweeny asked is the installation of the outlet control structure part of that plan. Mr. Cokeley said it is shown on the plan but it is not a requirement to comply with the storm water ordinance. • Mr. Sweeny asked were you aware of the directive in the planning board resolution that Crystal Lake provide protection for runoff and drainage into Llewellyn Park. Mr. Cokeley said he is not familiar. • Mr. Sweeny asked you weren’t familiar when you prepared your plan. Mr. Cokeley said he wasn’t looking at Crystal Point’s runoff as part of this application. • Mr. Sweeny asked when you considered the overall plan to deal with the storm water coming out of or entering onto 40 Eagle Ridge did you consider other directives. Mr. Cokeley said no. • Mr. Sweeny asked were you made aware of the runoff water flow into Llewellyn Park before the installation of the elliptical pipe. Mr. Cokeley said no. • Mr. Sweeny asked did you prepare the reported dated July 19th, 2024 that the recommended effect taking immediate action to stem the runoff into Llewellyn Park. Mr. Cokeley said yes. • Mr. Sweeny asked did you indicate that the majority of the runoff into the drainage channel originates from upstream properties. Mr. Cokeley said yes. • Mr. Sweeny asked that doesn’t indicate that all of it came from upstream, is that correct. Mr. Cokeley said correct. • Mr. Sweeny asked some of it came from the applicant’s property, correct. Mr. Cokeley said correct. • Mr. Sweeny asked tonight you indicated that that you did not recommend that the elliptical pipe be removed, is that correct. Mr. Cokeley said he is not proposing anything to do with it. • Andrew Kessler at 29 Mountain Ave asked do any of the drawings, studies, or reports that has been submitted to the board for this application show the 36-inch elliptical pipe. Mr. Cokeley said it is an existing 36-inch pipe that is on their plans. • Mr. Kessler asked what plans of yours are they on. Mr. Cokeley said it is pretty much on every sheet 2-6. • Mr. Kessler asked when did you do these plans. Mr. Cokeley said the survey was conducted in May 2024; that’s the basis. • Mr. Kessler asked did you have any communication with the applicant or the applicant’s counsel as to
did you do these plans. Mr. Cokeley said the survey was conducted in May 2024; that’s the basis. • Mr. Kessler asked did you have any communication with the applicant or the applicant’s counsel as to show or not to show the existing 36-inch pipe. Mr. Cokeley said no. • Mr. Kessler asked was that decision made by your group of engineers as experts that it should be shown on your drawings. Mr. Cokeley said it was picked up on the survey and he wouldn’t take something off of the survey. • Mr. Kessler asked when you saw it was there, did you have any communication with the town engineer concerning the 36-inch pipe. Mr. Cokeley said they did prepare a memo in July that was shared with the town but it is not part of this application. He did not talk to her directly. • Mr. Kessler asked did you receive a response from the town engineer concerning the 36- inch pipe. Mr. Cokeley said he believes they were directed to file a major site plan application. • Mr. Kessler asked did the town engineer request any information about the 36-inch pipe in your application. Mr. Cokeley said just that it complies with the ordinance.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
d62a37b8221b203,742 bytes