Supporting Documentation · Jul 16, 2025
4 16 25 WO PB Draft Minutes
d0d6626eed08542c07fc14cdfbea7096741415b1ca34ee6931019c1b9c56db52Indexed text · page 2
Show all pages2 • PB-24-19 TheWayMaker LLC Block: 106 Lot: 20.03 Zone: R-1 40 Eagle Ridge Way The applicant, TheWayMaker, LLC, proposes to undertake site work on a lot with an existing one-family dwelling. The proposed site work includes the installation of a subsurface chamber infiltration basin in the rear yard, as an enhancement to a previously approved stormwater seepage pit detention system. PRESENTATION • The attorney, Priscilla Triolo, on behalf of the applicant stated the applicant and the objector have reached terms of an agreement that will resolve a lot of the concerns the objector had. • The objector will return the application to the applicant to complete it. For the applicant to complete it, they need to review the terms of the agreement, introduce the exhibits that are part of the agreement, have the applicant’s engineer explain it and to provide other relevant testimonies they believe is necessary for the board to reach a final decision. • The parties met multiple times in order for the applicant and the objector of the Llewellyn Park Board of Managers to examine what each of their concerns were and then what was in the capacity of the applicant in order to meet those concerns and to address them through engineering actions. • There were series of communication that went on the legal end between Ms. Triolo and Mr. Simon, as well as the engineering end as to whether or not what they were discussing were feasible and workable and would solve the concerns of Llewellyn Park. • Llewellyn Park indicated they were concern about storm water drainage. To Ms. Triolo’s knowledge, there were no issues raised with the storm water management system that was proposed by Collier’s with this application fully designed and submitted. • There were issues that they were concern about that related to storm water management that was extraneous to the storm water management plan because the storm water management plan and system fully complied with the law and the ordinance and the state statues. • The parties agreed that there would be additional storm water control and that the landscaping that they previously represented to be completed was flushed out to be more sensitive to Llewelyn Park’s concern. The specific landscaping materials would then help control any surface storm water that might roll off the property. • They went through a series of landscaping plans and went
Llewelyn Park’s concern. The specific landscaping materials would then help control any surface storm water that might roll off the property. • They went through a series of landscaping plans and went through multiple descriptions of different plant life. They came up with a plan that addressed all of that and Mr. Cokeley will testify to the specifics. • On a legal basis, they are committed to doing all of the planting that doesn’t affect the storm water management system and it doesn’t require the system to be changed, altered, or redesigned. • There was a request from Llewellyn Park that they wanted the storm water ditch to have a different flow instead of being straight. They wanted it to have a curvature. Ms. Triolo makes no comment about the engineering proficiency about having a curve as opposed to having a straight ditch. • The applicant has an agreement with the adjourning property owner to move the ditch to the adjourning property in the configuration that Llewellyn Park wanted, provided that it isn’t regulated water because you can’t touch a ditch if its regulated water. • The applicant has committed to doing the work, committed to the design of the ditch, committed to the composition, committed to adding various elements of rip rap and other
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
d0d6626eed08220,592 bytes