Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Nov 10, 2024

West Orange Township_Fourth Round HEFSP_Final Draft

Preserved file SHA-256b08496f4f272779955d0f204f9d1dc52e9651894e9ab0504d4cadf48113086ae

Indexed text · page 212

Show all pages
Page 212

KMA HUE SAC MAMS ASSOCIATES The Township provided adequate evidence of compliance for most prior round strategies, including but not limited adopted zoning and affordability contrals. However, no, or inadequate information has been submitted for the following strategies. The Township should submit the missing information to confirm eligibility for credit. * Degnan House. The information submitted does not identify the unles which are eligible for credit or confirm affordability controls. The Township should submit the project's affordability controls and identify the units which are eligible for credit (as stated in the Housing Plan, 10 of 62 units are were occupted after April 1, 1980 and are therefore eligible for credit). * Easter Seal Society at 20-32 Kinsley St. No information has been submitted. The Township should submit the project's affordability contrals as well_as the speclal needs survey, and supporting documentation, available from COAH. » Merrywood Dr. Group Home, The Township submitted a deed far the property; however, it does not reference affordability controls or other information about the group home's operation. The Township should submit the project’s affordability controls as well as the special needs survey, and supporting documentation, available from COAX. * Habitat for Humanity, Unit 2. Affordability controls were not submitted for Unit 2, The Township should submit the affordability control for this unit. Notwithstanding the above items, the Tawnship’s satisfaction of the prior round obligation meets the applicable requirements for minimum rental units, maximum senior units, and the proper mix of income and bedroom distribution, Third Round Obligation The Township conducted a vacant land adjustment, pursuant to W.1A.C. 5:93-4.2., and it was subject to the Fairness Hearing and approved via the Court’s August 3, 202D Order on Fairness, Municipalities, such as West Orange, that do not have adequate capacity of developable land to fulfil the entirety of the affordable housing obligation are eligible for an adjustment of the obligation that reflects a realistic development potential (hereinafter “RDP”} and the unmet need, The ROP represents the portion of the new construction affordable housing obligation that can realistically be addressed with inclusionary development on lots identified as being developable in the vacant

Page 212

ROP represents the portion of the new construction affordable housing obligation that can realistically be addressed with inclusionary development on lots identified as being developable in the vacant land adjustment. The unmet need is calculated as the difference between the total obligation and the RDP. The Township's calculated ROP is 421 units, The vacant land adjustment was completed in accordance with W.LA.C. 5:93-4.2. More specifically, the Township evaluated vacant (property class 1) lands, public lands {property class 15c} and additional properties which were under-developed or otherwise may offer an opportunity far inclusionary affordable housing. Environmental constraints, such as but not limited to wetlands, and municipally owned recreation lands were excluded from generating an ROP. The Township Utilized densities between 6 and 67 du/ac and a 20% affordable housing set-aside to calculate the ROP. Township of West Crange { Docket No: ESX-4-4697-15 February 15, 2021 Complionce Hearing Page $

File revisions (1)