Supporting Documentation · Dec 18, 2025
2025 12 12 Engineering Review 3
0cdb7a7c7ffc9b256dfdd1795cdc78c372c4b0c41d7765e1802e95499bf7c3f8Indexed text · page 5
Show all pagesChairman and Members of the West Orange Township Zoning Board December 12, 2025 Re: PSE&G Company (ZB-24-06) Our File No. 115.WRZ0155.V04 Preliminary & Final Site Plan with ‘C’ and ‘D’ Page 5 Variances and Tree Removal Permit - Review #3 H:\Legacy\Howell-FS1\SEC\West Orange\Zoning Board\115.WRZ0155.V04 - PSE&G Company\2025-12-12 - Review #3.docx B. DESIGN COMMENTS 1. Based on our review, we find that the following items from the Township’s Site Plan/Subdivision Checklist must be addressed: a) Item #8 – Signature blocks for Chairman, Secretary, and Municipal Engineer b) Item #20 – Copy and/or delineation of any existing or proposed deed restrictions or covenants. c) Item #23 – List of required regulatory approvals or permits d) Item #48 – Sight triangles. 2. The Applicant has requested the following waivers: a) Item #31 – Contours to extend at least 200’ beyond subject property. b) Item #46 – Solid Waste Management Plan. c) Item #49 – Vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns. d) Item #50 – Parking plan showing spaces, size and type, aisle width, curb cuts, drives, driveways, and all ingress and egress areas and dimensions. 2. It shows on sheet 792788 of the West Orange Switching Station plans that the existing sidewalk along the Prospect Avenue and Mt. Pleasant Avenue site frontages is to be removed. However, it shows on sheet 3 of the Site Plan drawings that the existing sidewalk is to be removed/replaced if necessary. This discrepancy must be resolved. Please note that our office is opposed to removal of the existing sidewalk along the site frontages. 3. Sheet 792796 includes a Standard Concrete Driveway and Concrete Apron detail. Therefore, the plans must be revised to show where a concrete driveway and concrete apron are proposed. 4. Sheet 792797 includes a Typical Bollard Detail. Therefore, the plans must be revised to show the locations where bollards are proposed. 5. The Applicant has revised sheet 792790 to utilize underground detention basins, instead of bioretention basins, to address stormwater management and notes the change as conceptual. All applicable plans sheets, stormwater management plan and maintenance plan must be revised and submitted to the Board for review reflecting this change. 6. In our September 9, 2024 review letter, we noted several conflicts between utilities and stormwater infrastructure. Since the most recent submission
to the Board for review reflecting this change. 6. In our September 9, 2024 review letter, we noted several conflicts between utilities and stormwater infrastructure. Since the most recent submission does not include the depth of the stormwater infrastructure, our office cannot confirm if any of previously noted conflicts were resolved, nor if any new conflicts were created.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
0cdb7a7c7ffc350,392 bytes