05 Response to Technical Review Comments 12 17 2025

www.BohlerEngineering.com Ms. Jamilet Baquerizo Vite Township of West Orange BENJ File No. NJA230139 December 16, 2025 Page 8 of 14 a. Insufficient Side Yard Setback (Contiguous to Residential Lots) (§25-11.2) – A minimum side yard setback of 75 feet is required when adjacent to residential lots, where 40.3 feet exists with respect to Pleasant Valley Way and is proposed to remain. Acknowledged. b. Insufficient Parking Lot Screening (§25-12.1) – Where parking spaces are required to be screened, the eastern section of the property does not include landscaping; this is an existing condition that is proposed to remain. Acknowledged. c. Excessive Fence Height (§25-8.4) – Wood fencing reaching a height of 8 feet is proposed to be maintained in side and rear yards where the maximum height for this fencing is 6 feet. Further, 6-foot-tall chain link fencing is proposed to remain, where such fencing is not permitted to exceed 4 feet. Acknowledged. d. Insufficient Parking Space Dimensions (§25-12.1) – Where minimum standard parking space dimensions required are at least 9 feet in width and 18 feet in length, dimensions of 8 feet x 14.8 feet, respectively, exist and are proposed to remain. Acknowledged. e. Insufficient Loading Space Dimensions (§25-12.3) – Where minimum loading space dimensions required are at least 10 feet in width and 40 feet in length, dimensions of 9.2 feet x 42.9 feet, respectively, exist and are proposed to remain. Acknowledged. f. Monument Sign Standards (§25-15.3.C.2) – The applicant is proposing to maintain a monument sign with the following deviations from the Township Ordinance: insufficient front yard setback, Insufficient height, and excessive width. Acknowledged. 2. We have noted the following new variances are required: a. Excessive Impervious Cover (Chapter 25 Attachment 3) – A maximum impervious coverage of 60% is permitted, where 82.1% is proposed. Sheet C-301 has been revised to provide an updated impervious coverage square footage. This improves an existing nonconformity. b. Insufficient Parking Lot Trees (§25-12.1) – A minimum of 19 trees are required within the parking area, where 15 trees are proposed. The Landscape Plan (sheet L-201) has been revised to include a minimum of 19 parking lot trees. No variance is requested. c. Excessive Wall Height (§25-8.4) – In all nonresidential districts, a fence or wall to be used for screening

has been revised to include a minimum of 19 parking lot trees. No variance is requested. c. Excessive Wall Height (§25-8.4) – In all nonresidential districts, a fence or wall to be used for screening may not exceed six feet in height; the applicant is proposing a 8’ high screen wall. Acknowledged.