01 Proposal 3229706 Rev 12 10 2025

2 3229706.2 100724-109634 improvements such as curbing, paving, landscaping, lighting, an 8-foot concrete masonry unit screen wall behind the Main Building, and two new trash enclosures are also proposed, as is new signage. These improvements require preliminary and final major site plan approval, a soil removal permit, a tree removal and replacement permit, together with “c” variances seeking the following relief:1 1. § 25-7.1, Table of District Regulations, Part B: Bulk Standards, Attachment 3: The maximum permitted impervious coverage is 60%. Applicant is proposing impervious coverage of 82.1% (a decrease compared to the existing 83.8%). 2. § 25-8.1.a.: Accessory uses are not permitted in the front yard. Applicant proposes parking within a front yard (this modifies existing parking which is already located in the front yard). 3. § 25-8.1.b.: The minimum setback of an accessory use abutting a residential district is 10 feet. Applicant proposes parking with a setback of 5 feet (an improvement of the existing condition, which is zero feet). 4. § 25-8.2: Yard encroachments by accessory structures are not permitted. Applicant proposes a trash enclosure in the Mt. Pleasant Place front yard. 5. § 25-8.4.d.: In all nonresidential districts, a fence or wall to be used for screening may not exceed six feet in height. Applicant is proposing an 8- foot high screen wall. 6. § 25-8.15: Screening of utility structures is required, on three sides. Applicant proposes a transformer on a pad, within a service area, which is largely blocked from public view but does not provide landscape screening. 7. § 25-12.3.a.1.: A minimum of four loading spaces are required. Applicant proposes two loading spaces (compared to one existing). 8. § 25-14.3: A minimum illumination of 2.0 foot-candles is required within B- 2 Zone parking areas. Applicant is proposing foot-candle levels between 0.5 and 2.0 within certain portions of the parking areas. 9. § 25-14.4.l: A maximum canopy projection of 6’-0” is permitted. Applicant is proposing a canopy projection of 8’-7”, including a canopy-mounted 1 Based on discussion at the Site Plan Review Advisory Board, Applicant has included in its variance request existing nonconformities which are being improved. Existing nonconformities which are proposed to remain unchanged are not included because they do not require variance relief.