26 01 15 CME Review 1

Chairman and Members of the West Orange Township Planning Board January 15, 2026 Re: 262 Main Street Realty, LLC & 270 Main Street Realty, LLC (PB25-12) File No. 115.WRP0114.V01 Preliminary & Final Site Plan with “C” Variances and Page 8 Tree Removal Permit - Review #1 H:\Legacy\Howell-FS1\SEC\West Orange\Planning Board\115.WRP0114.V01 - 262 & 270 Main Street Realty, LLC\26-01-15 - Review #1.docx street traffic for the AM and PM weekday and peak hour of the generator for Saturday. The Applicant should provide testimony on the peak hour analysis to the Board. 5. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, the data point and equation graphs for the supermarket during the weekday peak hour of adjacent road between 7am to 9am generated a total average rate of 56. When using the peak hour of the generator, the total average rate and total fitted curve are 120 and 169, respectively. The Applicant should provide testimony to the Board on why peak hour of adjacent road is significantly lower than the peak hour of generator. 6. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, Figure 2B notes an evening peak hour from 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Whereas, the Intersection Turning Movement Count notes the evening peak hour at the Main Street/Kling Street intersection from 5:15 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. and at the Main Street/Prospect Place intersection from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. This discrepancy must be resolved. 7. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, Figure 2C notes a Saturday peak hour from 12:15 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. Whereas, the Intersection Turning Movement Count notes the Saturday peak hour at the Main Street/Erwin Place intersection from 11:30 a.m. to 12:20 p.m. This discrepancy must be resolved. 8. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, the Intersection Turning Movement Count notes the AM peak hour factor at the Main Street/Kling Street intersection 0.891. Whereas, the Synchro report notes the peak hour factor of the AM conditions 0.93. This discrepancy must be resolved. 9. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, the Intersection Turning Movement Count notes the PM peak hour factor at the Main Street/Prospect Place intersection 0.95. Whereas, the Synchro report notes the peak hour factor of the PM conditions 0.98. This discrepancy must be resolved. 10. Within the

eak hour factor at the Main Street/Prospect Place intersection 0.95. Whereas, the Synchro report notes the peak hour factor of the PM conditions 0.98. This discrepancy must be resolved. 10. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, the Intersection Turning Movement Count notes the Saturday peak hour factor at the Main Street/Erwin Place intersection 0.97. Whereas, the Synchro report notes the peak hour factor of the Saturday conditions 0.94. This discrepancy must be resolved. 11. Within the Technical Appendix of the Traffic Impact Assessment, Figure 4a, 4b and 4c should be revised to clarify how the distribution of the projected counts was determined. D. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMMENTS 1. The proposed development will result in the disturbance of more than one-half acre. As a result, it is classified as a Major Development, as defined in §25-29 of the Ordinance, and is subject to the stormwater management requirements set forth in §25-29.4 of the Ordinance.