Artheon Review 2

PAGE | 5 the ownership of the existing driveway and plans to restore the driveway. The plans should be revised to show the existing driveway with the proposed improvements. 11. The site plan sheets C1.02, C1.05, C1.07 and C1.11 must be revised to include the names of each street fronting the site. 12. The topographic survey on sheet C1.01 of the site plans should be revised to reflect the intersection of Main Street and Kling Street. Further, this revision must be reflected on the applicable sheets of the site plans. 13. The two on-site parking spaces fronting Prospect Place do not comply with §25-12.1f of the Ordinance which states that “all parking areas shall be so designed that vehicles are not compelled to back directly onto a public right-of-way.” 14. The parking space access from Prospect Place does not comply with §25-12.1i of the Ordinance which states that “each entrance or exit from such parking area shall be at least 50 feet from any residential district.” 15. The on-site loading space does not comply with §25-12.3b2 and §25-12.4a2 of the Ordinance since it is located less than five feet from the side yard. 16. The on-street loading space does not comply with §25-12.3b2 of the Ordinance since it is not located within the side or rear yard of the property. 17. The Applicant should address the Board regarding whether any of the EV parking spaces are make-ready. If so, the Applicant should provide testimony to the Board regarding the timeline to convert the spaces from make-ready to EVSE. 18. Sheet C1.02 of the site plans must be revised to clearly show the limits of proposed sidewalk. 19. The existing curbing on Erwin Place and Prospect Place is Belgium Block. Therefore, the plans should be revised to specify Belgium Block curbing on Erwin Place and Prospect Plan. 20. The site plan (sheet C1.02) must be revised to provide a curved radius at the intersection of curblines. The radii of all proposed curb intersections must be labeled. 21. The sight triangles shown on the plans should be revised to follow AASHTO standards. Specifically, the decision point should be set 14.5 feet away from the traveled way of Main Street. 22. Sheet C1.02 of the site plans notes an approximate refuse area. The Applicant must provide testimony to the Board regarding the contents of the refuse area as well as demonstrate that the area will have adequate capacity to

plans notes an approximate refuse area. The Applicant must provide testimony to the Board regarding the contents of the refuse area as well as demonstrate that the area will have adequate capacity to accommodate the trash and recyclables that will be generated at the site.