Response Letter 3226rcd 3 12 2026

. The Stormwater Management Report should be revised to indicate that the project is classified as a major development in accordance with the Township's Stormwater Control Ordinance (Section 25-29). This comment has been addressed and on page #2 of The Stormwater Management under the ‘Stormwater Management’ section has been revised to indicate the project is classified as a major development. . The Stormwater Management Report should be revised to verify compliance with the applicable groundwater recharge standards. This comment has been addressed, and the report has been revised to indicate that applicable ground water recharge is applicable and the standards have been met, as per calculations on page 138. . The Stormwater Management Report should be revised to indicate how the proposed BMPs comply with the applicable green infrastructure (Gl) standards. This comment has been addressed, and the pervious pavement system is considered a form of green infrastructure. The proposed pervious pavement system qualifies as a GI BMP in accordance with the NJDEP Stormwater Management Rules, as it promotes on-site infiltration, groundwater recharge, and stormwater volume reduction consistent with the intent of the GI requirements. . The hydrograph routings provided within the Stormwater Management Report should be revised to model impervious areas and pervious areas separately. This comment does not need to be addressed, as the application HydroCAD separates the impervious and pervious areas. In the bottom right-hand corner of the sub catchment view the different CN values are shown. . The Stormwater Management Report should be revised to include a stormwater runoff quantity analysis for the pre-construction and post- construction projected 2-, 10-, 25- and 100-year storm events. This comment has been addressed, and The Stormwater Management Report has been revised to show the 2, 10, 25 and 100 year storm events. . The existing and proposed drainage area maps should be revised to label each segment of the time of concentration flow path including indicate the flow type, length of segment and slope of segment. Additionally, existing and proposed time of concentration calculations should be provided for review. This comment has been addressed, and both Drainage area maps have been revised to reflect flow type, slope, and time of concentration. . Revise the

ration calculations should be provided for review. This comment has been addressed, and both Drainage area maps have been revised to reflect flow type, slope, and time of concentration. . Revise the Grading, Drainage, Soil Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (sheet 6) to include invert elevations for all pipes, including roof leaders and at the underground basin connection. This comment has been addressed, and Sheet #6 has been revised to indicate all inverts on pipes including roof leaders.