Supporting Documentation · Jul 1, 2026
06192026_PB 26 01 15 Ridgeway Avenue Planning Review 2
1e217b0439659df72c66b8ce0256efc34ef0d967c719afcd1bd3885986da4797Indexed text · page 8
Show all pagesMemorandum Page 8 of 8 The c(1) hardship criteria states that a “hardship” will occur if the variance is not granted. The hardship relates to the physical or topographical features of the property and cannot relate to financial or personal hardship. Hardship relating to property can include: i. Narrowness, shallowness, or irregular shape ii. An exceptional topographic condition iii. Other unique conditions or features affecting the property The c(2) flexible variance states that by granting the variance, the purposes of the MLUL would be advanced by a deviation from the zoning ordinance requirement and that the benefits of granting the variance substantially outweigh the detriments. b. Negative criteria: The applicant must satisfy the two-prong test of the negative criteria; i. The variance can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good; and ii. The variance can be granted without causing substantial detriment to the zone plan. The applicant’s testimony regarding the negative criteria should address any potential impacts that the proposed variances may have on the neighborhood, as well as how the proposed development is consistent with, or in potential conflict with, both the zoning ordinance and the Township’s Master Plan. 3. The Applicant has provided a proposal with variance justifications in the application materials.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
1e217b043965429,153 bytes