Supporting Documentation · Sep 2, 2026
07172026_PB 26 02 27 Fairway Drive Planning Review 1
50018e030bb9237fc6f7c3f2e8a39e7a012c766d0a13f602ed81c06eb56eeb31Indexed text · page 8
Show all pagesMemorandum Page 8 of 8 The c(2) flexible variance states that by granting the variance, the purposes of the MLUL would be advanced by a deviation from the zoning ordinance requirement and that the benefits of granting the variance substantially outweigh the detriments. b. Negative criteria: The applicant must satisfy the two-prong test of the negative criteria; i. The variance can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good; and ii. The variance can be granted without causing substantial detriment to the zone plan. The applicant’s testimony regarding the negative criteria should address any potential impacts that the proposed variances may have on the neighborhood, as well as how the proposed development is consistent with, or in potential conflict with, both the zoning ordinance and the Township’s Master Plan. 3. The Applicant has provided a proposal with variance justifications in the application materials.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
50018e030bb9506,567 bytes