Supporting Documentation · Sep 2, 2026
6 10 26 WO PB Draft Minutes
a5c481db718ff7e6b633b4a42d8c250a942c74d9249ac184cc1b5ddc4da63144Indexed text · page 12
Show all pages12 the case. He states that the proposed trees are already substantial at approximately 8 feet tall. He cautions that trees should not be planted too close together. ○ Ms. Moore reiterates that the project includes the proposed buffer and that the applicant will meet with the municipal forester regarding the trees, buffer, and residential character of the site. - Mr. Cardoza asks about the operation of the building's lobby. Mr. Jarmel states the lobby will be unmanned and will not have a concierge. - Mr. Cardoza asks about package deliveries and whether there will be restrictions on delivery hours. Mr. Jarmel states the lobby will remain accessible 24 hours a day to authorized users. Delivery personnel who are authorized to enter the building will be able to obtain access as needed. - Mr. Cardoza asks where delivery vans such as UPS or postal vehicles are expected to park. Mr. Jarmel says delivery vehicles are not intended to park on Sheridan. Delivery vehicles should use the eight visitor spaces located off Northfield - Mr. Cardoza asks about deliveries to the proposed retail space. The retail space is approximately 1,250 square feet. Mr. Jarmel expects deliveries to be made by relatively small vehicles such as vans. - Mr. Cardoza asks whether a delivery van would have enough room to maneuver if the parking area were occupied. Mr. Jarmel says the project provides a 24-foot-wide drive aisle. He states that a standard delivery van should be able to make a K-turn within the drive aisle - Mr. Cardoza asks whether delivery companies will be instructed not to stop on Northfield in front of the retail space. Mr. Jarmel says the applicant can provide directions to companies such as Amazon, UPS, and FedEx regarding where deliveries should occur. He acknowledges, however, that actually enforcing where delivery vehicles stop can become an enforcement issue. - Mr. Cardoza asks a question regarding roof access for the fire department. Mr. Jarmel explains that the building code does not require a stairway to the roof and that the plans show roof hatches. ○ Mr. Cardoza notes that the local fire department prefers stair access, and Mr. Jarmel says that the project could accommodate stairs if necessary. - Mr. Cardoza asks about the three parking spaces outside Parking Entrance A and whether they would be assigned to residents or used for visitors and retail overflow. Mr.
ommodate stairs if necessary. - Mr. Cardoza asks about the three parking spaces outside Parking Entrance A and whether they would be assigned to residents or used for visitors and retail overflow. Mr. Jarmel explains that the spaces would primarily be assigned to residents. If they are not needed for residents, they could instead be used as overflow parking. - Mr. Cardoza asks about the width of the parking entrance. Mr. Jarmel explains that it is approximately 25.9 feet wide at its narrowest point and approximately 27 feet wide where it comes in from the road. - Mr. Cardoza asks about security measures and whether security personnel would be provided since there would not be a concierge. Mr. Jarmel explains that the lobby vestibule would have card-controlled access. The outer door could remain open, while the inner door would remain locked. A virtual concierge/intercom system would allow visitors to contact a resident in the building. The resident could remotely buzz the visitor into the building or come down to let the visitor in. - Mr. Cardoza asks whether the project would have sufficient security cameras. Mr. Jarmel says it definitely would. - Mr. Cardoza asks whether the camera data would be stored off-site with sufficient storage, and Mr. Jarmel indicates that the system would provide the necessary security coverage and storage.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
a5c481db718f336,627 bytes