Ltr Vite final requesting extension 81726

XV, . The requested variances satisfy the ¢ (2) criteria as noted in the case of Kaufman v. Planning Bd. For Warren Tp, 110 Nu. 551 (1988) and Pullen v. Tp. Of South Plainfield, 291 NJ. Super. | at 9 (App. Div. 1996) “cannot be considered in isolation, but must be considered in the context of its effect on the development proposal, the neighborhood, and the zoning plan.” 3. The proposed two fansily home satisfies the c (2) criteria because the project as a whole advances the purpose of the MLUL as it satisfies a number of the principals of the MLUL (specifically paragraphs a, c, e, g, hand i), provides needed in-fill housing, and is a significant aesthetic improvement to the neighborhood. 4, The benefits of the project outweigh any negatives, 5. The proposed minor subdivision and related bulk variances for the proposed two-family house meets the goals set forth in the Master Plan. _NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Board of the Township of ‘West Orange that approval for minor subdivision with c variances to constract a new two-family wevnernmmeranens« NOUSE On Lot B.is-granted;and----—- IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval granted to Tompkins Realty, LLC, is subject to the following terms and conditions: 1, The Applicant shall comply with all applicable Township, County, State and Federal laws, ordinances, regulations, and directives, including without limitation, obtaining all applicable local, state, and federal approvals, or permits. If another governmental entity or agency grants a waiver or a variance affecting the plans and/or exhibits submitted by the Applicant, this approval or the conditions attached to it, then the Applicant shall re-apply to this Board respecting the same and this Board shall have the right to view