Supporting Documentation · Jan 23, 2018
57-18 Exhibit - Urging State of New Jersey to Implement Charitable Trust in Lieu of Local Taxes Plan.pdf
0bc382b5b8ceefbfdc1f564e45fc4688b145a6db33b65d673e8e9d4b99aa4496Indexed text · page 3
Show all pagesFEDERAL TAX TREATMENT OF STATE CHARITABLE TAX CREDITS the federal alternative minimum tax by disallowing the deduction for state/local taxes.5 As a result, from 1987 onward, taxpayers subject to the federal AMT have found it advantageous to make charitable gifts generating state tax credits.6 These gifts had the felicitous effect of increasing the taxpayer’s (deductible) charitable contributions while simultaneously reducing her (non-‐deductible) state tax obligations. In light of recent federal legislation further limiting the deductibility of state and local taxes,7 states may expand their use of charitable tax credits in this manner, focusing new attention on the legal underpinnings of the Full Deduction Rule. The Full Deduction Rule has been applied to credits that completely offset the pre-‐tax cost of the contribution. In most cases, however, the state credits offset less than 100% of the cost. We believe that, at least in this latter and more typical set of cases, the Full Deduction Rule represents a correct and long-‐standing trans-‐substantive principle of federal tax law. According to judicial and administrative pronouncements issued over several decades, nonrefundable state tax credits are treated as a reduction or potential reduction of the credit recipient’s state tax liability rather than as a receipt of money, property, contribution to capital, or other item of gross income. As discussed in greater detail below, the Full Deduction Rule is supported not only by decades of
r item of gross income. As discussed in greater detail below, the Full Deduction Rule is supported not only by decades of precedent but by a host of policy considerations. These considerations include federal respect for state initiatives and allocation of tax liabilities, and near-‐insuperable administrative burdens posed by alternative rules. The combination of precedent and policy justifications suggests that the Full Deduction Rule should survive administrative and judicial challenge. We believe that changes to the Full Deduction Rule would require legislation. We also caution Congress that a legislative override of the Full Deduction Rule would raise significant administrability concerns and would implicate important federalism values. Congress should tread carefully if it seeks to alter the Full Deduction Rule by statute. Background on the Charitable Contribution Deduction Availability of Deduction. Section 170(a) of the federal Internal Revenue Code provides for a deduction for “charitable contributions” as defined in section 170(c). Deductible 5 26 U.S.C. 56(b)(1)(A)(ii) (enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986). 6 See, e.g., Bryan Strike, Charitable Donation and State Tax Credit!, Kays Financial Advisory Corporation, Professional Wealth Management Services (September 20, 2016) (describing tax advantages for AMT taxpayers to make deductible gifts to Georgia’s Student
anagement Services (September 20, 2016) (describing tax advantages for AMT taxpayers to make deductible gifts to Georgia’s Student Scholarship Organizations, which entitle donors to 100% state tax credit); David Slade, ‘Donation’ Can Make You a Profit, The Post and Courier (July 12, 2014) (describing benefit to AMT taxpayers of making deductible gifts to South Carolina’s Exceptional SC fund, which entitle donors to 100% state tax credit). 7 P.L. 115-‐97, An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018. 2 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3098291
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
0bc382b5b8ce433,758 bytes