Supporting Documentation · Jan 23, 2018
57-18 Exhibit - Urging State of New Jersey to Implement Charitable Trust in Lieu of Local Taxes Plan.pdf
0bc382b5b8ceefbfdc1f564e45fc4688b145a6db33b65d673e8e9d4b99aa4496Indexed text · page 4
Show all pagesFEDERAL TAX TREATMENT OF STATE CHARITABLE TAX CREDITS contributions include donations not only to familiar non-‐profit organizations such as those qualifying for tax-‐exempt status under section 501(c)(3) but also “a State, a possession of the United States, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or the United States or the District of Columbia, but only if the contribution or gift is made for exclusively public purpose.”8 Donations can be made in either cash or property. Amount of Deduction. The amount of the deduction is generally the amount of cash or the fair market value (or in some instances the basis) of property contributed to the qualifying entity. Treasury Regulations provide that the amount deductible may not exceed the excess of: “(A) The amount of any cash paid and the fair market value of any property (other than cash) transferred by the taxpayer to an organization described in section 170(c); over (B) The fair market value of the goods or services the organization provides in return.” Treas. Reg. Sec. 170A-‐1(h)(2)(i) By virtue of this “quid pro quo” provision, a taxpayer who makes a $100 gift to public radio and receives a tote bag in return must reduce the amount of the deduction by the fair market value of the tote bag. For example, if the value of the tote bag is estimated to be $20, the taxpayer may only claim a deduction of $80.9
bag. For example, if the value of the tote bag is estimated to be $20, the taxpayer may only claim a deduction of $80.9 Federal Tax Deduction for Charitable Contributions. The basic logic underlying the quid pro quo regulation is that the deduction should be limited to the actual net cost of the gift to the taxpayer — i.e., the gross amount of the gift minus the value of goods or services received in exchange for the gift. While this “net cost to the taxpayer” principle makes intuitive sense, it bears noting that federal tax law ignores (and has always ignored) the value of the federal charitable contribution deduction itself. These tax savings are often substantial. For a taxpayer subject to a 37 percent marginal tax rate, a $100 gift results in a $100 deduction, even though that deduction reduces the net cost of the gift to $63. In other words, in making the quid pro quo determination, federal tax law ignores the $37 of tax savings arising from the gift. If instead of cash the taxpayer donates $100 value property with a zero basis, she not only secures a $100 deduction but also avoids federal income tax on the $100 of built-‐in gain, saving her (assuming the property is a capital asset held for more than a year) another $20 in federal income tax liability. In this case, the net cost of the gift to the taxpayer—after backing out the federal tax savings—would be only
g out the federal tax savings—would be only 8 26 U.S.C. 170(c)(1). 9 This example assumes the cost of the tote bag exceeds $10.90 and thus is not treated as an “insubstantial benefit” within the meaning of Rev. Proc. 90-‐12 as adjusted for inflation under Rev. Proc. 2017-‐58, Section 2.30(2). 3
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
0bc382b5b8ce433,758 bytes