Supporting Documentation · Jan 23, 2018
57-18 Exhibit - Urging State of New Jersey to Implement Charitable Trust in Lieu of Local Taxes Plan.pdf
0bc382b5b8ceefbfdc1f564e45fc4688b145a6db33b65d673e8e9d4b99aa4496Indexed text · page 6
Show all pagesFEDERAL TAX TREATMENT OF STATE CHARITABLE TAX CREDITS (apparently Missouri)11 where four separate programs entitle donors to state tax credits with unspecified credit percentages. With regard to each of the four programs considered, donors may contribute cash or other property. The legal analysis set forth in the 2011 IRS memo is straightforward. The memo first provides an overview of the current treatment of charitable contributions where the donor receives some benefit in return, noting (consistent with the analysis above) that the deduction is allowable “only to the extent the amount transferred exceeds the fair market value of the benefit received, and only if the excess amount was transferred with the intent of making a gift.”12 Citing judicial holdings in McLennan v. United States,13 Skripak v. Commissioner,14 and Allen v. Commissioner,15 the memo reaffirms the well-‐established conclusion that the “tax benefit of a federal or state charitable contribution deduction is not regarded as a return benefit that negates charitable intent, reducing or eliminating the deduction itself” (emphasis added). In addition, citing Browning v. Commissioner,16 the memo observes that the value of the deduction “has not been treated as an item of income under § 61, in the form of an amount realized on the transfer under § 1001.”17 In each of the court cases cited in the memo, the value of state tax deduction is not treated as a payment from the state or as property received from the state but rather as a
te tax deduction is not treated as a payment from the state or as property received from the state but rather as a reduction, or potential reduction, of state tax liability. In other words, where a charitable gift entitles the donor to a state charitable contribution deduction, the Full Deduction Rule applies and the donor is not required to reduce the amount of the federal charitable contribution deduction under Treas. Reg. Sec. 170A-‐1(h)(2)(i)(B). 11 While Missouri is not named in the memorandum, the addressee is the associate area counsel in Kansas City, and Missouri has several tax credit programs that match the descriptions in the memo. See Mo. Dep’t of Revenue, Miscellaneous Tax Credits, http://dor.mo.gov/taxcredit (last visited Jan. 2, 2017). 12 CCA 201105010, p.4. 13 23 Cl. Ct. 99 (1991), subsequent proceedings, 24 Cl. Ct. 102, 106 n.8 (1991), aff’d, 994 F.2d 839 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (noting that “a donation of property for the exclusive purpose of receiving a tax deduction does not vitiate the charitable nature of the contribution).” 14 84 T.C. 285, 319 (1985) (noting that “a taxpayer's desire to avoid or eliminate taxes by contributing cash or property to charities cannot be used as a basis for disallowing the deduction for that charitable contribution”). 15 92 T.C. 1, 7 (1989) (noting that “a
as a basis for disallowing the deduction for that charitable contribution”). 15 92 T.C. 1, 7 (1989) (noting that “a taxpayer's desire to avoid or eliminate taxes by contributing cash or property to charities cannot be used as a basis for disallowing the deduction for that charitable contribution”). 16 109 T.C. 303, 325 (1997) (“Respondent's argument suggests that a taxpayer making a gift of stock worth $100 to a charitable organization may be entitled to a charitable contribution deduction of some lesser amount on account of the economic value of the deduction. That suggestion is untenable. The regulations provide explicitly that, if a charitable contribution is made in property, the amount of the contribution is the fair market value of the property.”) 17 CCA 201105010, p.4. 5
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
0bc382b5b8ce433,758 bytes