Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · May 8, 2018

121-18 Attachment.pdf

Preserved file SHA-25645ee768f619f7a965cb04f2e271fe5eaa4294094221644a2d503f8283e07abc0

Indexed text · page 28

Show all pages
Page 28

ASSOCIATES Mr. Leonard R. Lepore, PE April 18, 2018 Municipal Engineer/Director of Public Works Page 9 of 10 Re: Fire House No, 4, 280 Pleasant Valley Way- LSRP Services SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR LSRP SERVICES The enactment of the Site Remediation Reform Act (SRRA; N.J.S.A. 58:10C-1 et seq) on May 7, 2009, and the adoption of the Administrative Requirements for the Remediation of Contaminated Sites (ARRCS; N.J.A.C. 7:26C) on November 4, 2009 require that all new remediation cases follow the provisions of SRRA. A key requirement of these rules is that a Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) must oversee all new remediation cases. The ARRCS requires the person responsible for conducting a remediation to notify the NJDEP of any confirmed discharges of contaminants or condition of Immediate Environmental Concern (“IEC”). Please note that being an LSRP, as a State licensed professional, I will thus have the obligation to report any such conditions to the NJDEP without obtaining any prior approval from the client. LSRP will provide the required services in accordance with SRRA and has the obligation to submit, maintain and preserve the relevant documents. LSRP is not responsible for client’s failure to disclose relevant information, perform SRRA obligations, fund remediation, and follow LSRP’s recommended actions. Client’s failure to perform these obligations may result in fines/penalties by the NIDEP. The issuance of RAO by LSRP is not a guarantee or warranty that the site is free of contamination, or that it will be accepted by the NJDEP. NJDEP may audit the RAO within three (3) years after the date the LSRP filed the RAO with the NJDEP. LSRP is not responsible for additional requirements imposed by NJDEP after review/audit, except to the extent they arise out of LSRP’s negligence.

File revisions (1)