98-24 Exhibits A - Evaluation Report for the Contract for Operation of West Orange Recycling Center - 2024.pdf

(2) Does the Respondent provide sufficient documentation that its staff has the requisite qualifications and experience to perform the work under the Contract. 4) Violations, Fines, Notices of Violations history from any governmental agency (1) Does the Respondent have a history of violations, fines or other citations which evidence a pattern of the Respondent disregarding of the governing Federal and State statutes? (2) Does the Respondent have a history of violations, fines or other citations which evidence a pattern of the Respondent disregarding of the governing regulations and local ordinances or law? Technical Criteria 5) Equipment to be assigned to perform the work (1) Does the Respondent document that it has the requisite equipment or resources to perform the work required under the Contract? 6) Detailed site improvement plan (1) Does the Respondent’s proposed site improvement plan offer the best use of the space for performance of the Contract? For each respondent, the following evaluation is provided for the selection committee’s use. Note that this evaluation does not include a review of the formal submission requirements. Submission requirements are being reviewed separately by the Purchasing Agent’s Office. Further, DeFeo Associates notes that with regard to Cost Criteria, the full five -year term has been utilized for the purpose of this evaluation. Although this is a three-year contract with two-one-year renewal options, New Jersey requires that the five - year term be utilized for purposes of any financial evaluation. Mazza Mulch, Inc. Cost Criteria: Mazza Mulch, Inc. (Mazza) submitted an annual rent payment of $162,000/year for the five - year contract term totaling $810,000 in

inancial evaluation. Mazza Mulch, Inc. Cost Criteria: Mazza Mulch, Inc. (Mazza) submitted an annual rent payment of $162,000/year for the five - year contract term totaling $810,000 in rent over five years. No revenue sharing proposal was submitted. No specific revenue contribution for site improvements was offered. The submission appears to meet the requirements outlined in the RFP with regard to form and information requested. 3