Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Dec 10, 2024

344-24 Exhibit B-2022 SRTS RES 289-24 AND AGREEMENT.pdf

Preserved file SHA-256a4ec12b838e5d794c1cbf5be85a076ac404d1934de6aedbbea55a2da56ac64fc

Indexed text · page 15

Show all pages
Page 15

March 2022 New Jersey Department of Transportation Told 9. 9.1 Division of Local Aid and Economic Development Federal Aid Cost Reimbursement Agreement contractor and consultant. Payment of the actual, eligible costs shall be made on monthly or quarterly payment vouchers submitted by the Subrecipient based upon the percentage of the contracted work completed as shown in the Subrecipient's monthly progress reports. 7.7.4. Subrecipient shall require its contractors and consultants to comply with the applicable cost principles set forth in this Section and the requirements of Section 12 below by placing equivalent provisions in their contracts. Subrecipient shall require all subcontracting be performed in accordance with the Standard Specifications and 23 C.F.R. § 635.116. Conflict of Interest All FHWA Federal Aid Highway Program (FAHP) funds provided for locally administered projects must pass through NJDOT pursuant to 23 C.F.R §172.5. NJDOT, as the grant recipient, is responsible for ensuring the Subrecipient complies with Federal requirements. This includes ensuring sufficient controls are in place to protect the public’s interest against fraud, waste, and abuse of taxpayer resources. Federal requirements and FHWA policies do not expressly prohibit the use of the same consulting firm for design and construction inspection services on the same project. However, the use of the same firm for design and inspection may present potential conflicts of interest that provide opportunities that benefit the consulting engineering firm and not the Subrecipient. A consulting firm performing construction inspection services for the same federal-aid project that the firm also designed provides the firm an opportunity to influence or affect decisions on scope changes; design changes; construction revisions; contract change orders; and related issues. A firm may have a vested financial interest in failing to disclose deficiencies in its design work during construction, such as minimizing or ignoring design errors and omissions rather than serving the best interest of the public. Using a different firm for construction inspection provides an additional level of review and reduces the risk for potential conflicts of interest. Prior to allowing a consulting firm to provide services on subsequent phases of the same project, the Subrecipent must establish appropriate

Page 15

w and reduces the risk for potential conflicts of interest. Prior to allowing a consulting firm to provide services on subsequent phases of the same project, the Subrecipent must establish appropriate compensating controls in the form of policies, procedures, practices, and other safeguards to ensure a conflict of interest does not occur in the procurement, management, and administration of consultant services as specified in 23 CFR 172.7(b)(4). Liquidated Damages Liquidated damages must be specified for all federally funded projects. Liquidated Damages are defined as the daily amount set forth in the contract to be deducted from the contract price to cover damages to the State and the Subrecipient as a result of the contractor's failure to complete work within the specified Contract Time. The amount of liquidated damages set forth in all contracts pursuant to this Agreement shall take into account the Subrecipient’s estimated costs incurred as well as road user costs. Liquidated damages must be assessed by the Subrecipient in accordance with the Standard 14

File revisions (1)