157-25 Exhibit.pdf

Appendix C-1- Design Proposal Evaluation Guide & Form Points Guidance Expected Occurrence 10 Excellent, insightful response- Meets all Evaluation Criteria for each 1 thru | Rare (<5%) 8 below 8-9 Very Good, thoughtful response — Meets 80-90% of Criteria Occasional (20%) 6-7 Good, More than adequate response - Meets 60-70% of Criteria Frequent (40% or >) 45 Adequate response, no specialinsights - Meets 40-50% of Criteria Occasional (20%) 2-3 Inadequate response - Meets 20-30% of Criteria Infrequent (< 10%) 0-1 Totally inadequate response, No response given - Meets 0-10% of Criteria | Rare (< 5%) Evaluation eS Possible Points Weighted | Total Criteria a : f Points Awarded | Multiplier | Points 1. Demonstration of understanding of the scope of work for the 0-10 0.15 project 2. Technical approach to the project, including the application and degree of innovation and creativity of the proposed concepts to 0-10 0.20 meet the project’s goals and objectives 3. Demonstration of the team’s ability to outline public outreach strategies and successfully perform the public outreach and 0-10 0.10 stakeholder task 4. Firm’s professional qualifications, experience and technical oa ni competence with similar federally funded projects ; 5. Qualifications and relevant experience of the project manager 6 ois 6. Project specific qualification, and demonstrated knowledge and experience of team leaders and key staff members on the proposed 0-10 0.15 study 7. Ability to successfully perform work, including availability of resources, project management expertise and experience in similar ats ein project, and quality assurance/control management ability of both the consultant firm and the project manager 8. Quality, clarity, content and thoroughness of proposal in addressing required tasks and compliance with submission 0-10 0.05 guideline, including profession presentation TOTAL SCORE 1.00 Evaluator: Title/Affiliation: Date Evaluated: