2945-25 Dartmouth-Road-Forest-Hill-Road-All-Way-Stop-Final.pdf

All-Way Stop Warrant Analysis Dartmouth Road & Forest Hill Road Project No.: 251404 November 7, 2025 Page 6 of 14 70 South Orange Avenue, Suite 109 PO Box 99 Livingston, New Jersey 07039 Roseland, NJ 07068 C: (732) 236-7557 T: (973) 228-0999 F: (201) 753-3904 BrightViewEngineering.com III. ALL-WAY STOP ANALYSIS Table 4 – All-Way Stop Analysis Results Warrant A – Crash Experience ..................................................................................... Not Satisfied Warrant B – Sight Distance .......................................................................................... Not Satisfied Warrant C – Transition to Signal/Yield Control at Circular Intersection ................. Not Applicable Warrant D – 8-Hour Volume ........................................................................................ Not Satisfied Warrant E – Other Factors .................................................................................................. Satisfied Based on Table 4, an All-Way Stop is justified for the intersection of Dartmouth Road & Forest Hill Road per the MUTCD, 11th Edition guidelines. We utilized the following criteria in evaluating the study location for the application of an All- Way Stop treatment. The information below is excerpted from the MUTCD, Section 2B.12-17, All-Way Stop Control: Section 2B.12 All-Way Stop Control Support: 01 The provisions in the following sections describe warrants for the recommended engineering study to determine all-way stop control. Warrants are not a substitute for engineering judgment. The fact that a warrant for a particular traffic control device is met is not conclusive justification to install or not install all-way stop control. Because each intersection will have unique characteristics that affect its operational performance or safety, it is the engineering study for a given intersection that is ultimately the basis for a decision to install or not install all-way stop control. 02 All-way stop controls at intersections with substantially differing approach volumes can reduce the effectiveness of these devices for all roadway users. Guidance: 03 The decision to establish all-way stop control at an unsignalized intersection should be based on an engineering study. The engineering study for all-way stop control should include an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety

an unsignalized intersection should be based on an engineering study. The engineering study for all-way stop control should include an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety at the intersection, the potential to improve these conditions, and the applicable factors contained in the following all-way stop control warrants: A. All-Way Stop Control Warrant A: Crash Experience (see Section 2B.13) B. All-Way Stop Control Warrant B: Sight Distance (see Section 2B.14) C. All-Way Stop Control Warrant C: Transition to Signal Control or Transition to Yield Control at a Circular Intersection (see Section 2B.15) D. All-Way Stop Control Warrant D: 8-Hour Volume (Vehicles, Pedestrians, Bicycles) (see Section 2B.16) E. All-Way Stop Control Warrant E: Other Factors (see Section 2B.17) Option: 04 The decision to install all-way stop control on site roadways open to public travel may be based on engineering judgment.