Minutes · Jun 18, 2015
June 18, 2015
83931cc267ac32e55d89c01752ab8247c7094a2ee9fa54023f6a93620a4fcf7cIndexed text
MINUTES TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2015 The West Orange Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on June 18, 2015 commencing 8:00 PM at 66 Main Street, West Orange, N.J. in Council Chambers. Chairman Buechler called the meeting to order at approximately 8:00 P.M. It was announced that notification of this meeting was given to the Township Clerk, the West Orange Chronicle, and posted on the Township Bulletin Board on December 11, 2014 in accordance with the “Open Public Meetings Act.” Chairman Buechler asked everyone to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. Alice Beirne, Esq., Board Attorney, read the Opening Statement. PRESENT: Bruce Buechler, Greg Bullock, Deborah Gabry, D. Nash, Philip D. Neuer, Bart Quentzel, Irv Schwarzbaum, William Steinhart, Mark Sussman, ABSENT: Alice Weiss (excused absence) ALSO PRESENT: Paul Grygiel, Consulting Planner Eric Keller, Consulting Engineer Alice Beirne, Esq., Board Attorney Rose DeSena, Board Secretary H. Grossman, Esq., Public Advocate D. Dillon, Audio-Digital Transcription Service ANNOUNCEMENTS Future Meetings: July 16, 2015 (regular meeting) — 8:00 pm August 20, 2015 (regular meeting) — 8:00 pm September 17, 2015 (regular meeting) — 8:00 pm
MINUTES Adopt Minutes: April 16, 2015 (regular meeting) Chairman Buechler asked the Board Members if they had any additional comments to the April 16, 2015 regular meeting that were submitted to them for review besides the comments that Mr. Neuer submitted. Seeing none, he asked for a motion to approve said minutes. Ms. Gabry made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 16, 2015 regular Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting as submitted to the Board members; Mr. Bullock seconded the motion and all were in favor. It was noted for the record that Ms. Nash was present but did not vote on these minutes. Adopt Minutes: June 4, 2015 (special meeting) Chairman Buechler asked the Board Members if they had any additional comments to the June 4, 2015 special meeting that were submitted to them for review besides the comments that Mr. Neuer submitted. Seeing none, he asked for a motion to approve said minutes. Ms. Gabry made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 4, 2015 special Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting as submitted to the Board members; Mr. Neuer seconded the motion and all were in favor. It was noted for the record that Ms. Nash and Mr. Schwarzbaum were present but did not vote on these minutes. SWEARING IN Diane Nash was sworn in as a new Zoning Board Member as Alternate #3. Consulting Planner for the Township, Paul Grygiel, and Consulting Engineer for the Township, Eric Keller were sworn under oath. APPLICATION(S) 1. ZB-13-15/Quick Chek Corp. Carried from 6/4/15 Block: 168; Lot: 26, 28; Zone: B-2 555 Northfield Avenue Seeking multiple “D” and several “C” variances for site plan and subdivision Approvals for developing a Quick Chek food store with fuel sales. Chairman Buechler stated that this application is being continued from June 4, 2015. He said at that time, the public hearing was declared closed and closing arguments were delivered by Ms. Porter, Mr. Magaletta and Mr. Grossman.
Chairman Buechler said that the Board will now deliberate and render a decision to this application and he asked the public to express their comments after the decision is announced outside of the chamber so that the Board can continue with the remainder of the Zoning Board meeting. Chairman Buechler stated that there are seven (7) voting Board Members and that is adequate for “d” and “c” variances. He said that Ms. Nash and Mr. Schwarzbaum will not be voting. Chairman Buechler stated that he would like to take a poll from the Board Members just to gauge how they will be voting; whether they will approve or deny this application. He said that this will not be the formal vote and asked the Board Members if they would agree to a short circuit vote; they were all in favor. Mr. Bullock stated that he is leaning to deny this application. Ms. Gabry stated that she will vote to deny this application. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that he will vote to deny this application. Mr. Sussman stated that he will vote to deny this application. Mr. Steinhart stated that he will vote to deny this application. Mr. Quentzel stated that he is going to abstain from voting. Chairman Buechler stated that he will vote to approve this application with modifications and conditions. Chairman Buechler stated that there are five votes to deny the application and asked the Board if they want to have a discussion or go to the formal vote. He also noted for the record that the Board’s decision may be appealed. Ms. Beirne stated that she would like the Board Members to state the reason for their vote for the resolution. Chairman Buechler asked for a motion from the Board. Vice Chairman Neuer moved to deny the entirety of the Quick Chek application requesting preliminary and final site plan approval and all of the variances. Ms. Gabry seconded the motion. Chairman Buechler asked the Board Secretary to call for the vote. Mr. Bullock stated that this application had several safety issues that cannot be overlooked and the citizen opposition cannot be ignored.
Mr. Bullock voted yes to deny the application. Ms. Gabry stated that the proposed site is in a congested area and that the applicant can find another location that can be more accommodating. Ms. Gabry voted yes to deny the application. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that he has the utmost respect for Ms. Porter and this is not about her not doing her job; he said that the location for this application is not appropriate. He said that he also has respect for the people representing Quick Chek and that Quick Chek would be a welcomed business in West Orange but just not in this location. Vice Chairman Neuer referred to some of the testimony provided during the hearings and said that he questioned the credibility of the witnesses, specifically Mr. McDonough’s testimony was not credible in this case. He said that the McDonough report was not valid the night he testified and that the Board relies on experts to explain the things that Board Members may not know. Vice Chairman Neuer said that he was also not impressed by the testimony of Ms. Pomeroy, the planner for the objectors. He said that her testimony did not sway him at all. Vice Chairman Neuer said that Mr. McDonough did not take the time and effort to update his fifteen (15) month outdated report which must be submitted to the Board Members at least ten (10) days in advance. He said that the professional planner’s report and testimony are at the core of a variance application. He further noted that Mr. McDonough did not do a study of the area. Vice Chairman Neuer said that the proposed Quick Chek is not offering any item that is not already offered in the area and that a larger piece of property would be more suitable for this multi-use project. Vice Chairman Neuer said that Mr. McDonough kept saying that the lot line is invisible; he said that you can see the lot line and it is not invisible. Vice Chairman Neuer said that he did not hear one valid reason why the lot line would be placed right on the building line of the existing hotel; he said that while the building should not be moved the lot line should be placed a minimum of ten (10) feet to the west. No credible evidence has been presented to justify this very substantial deviation from the Ordinance. Vice Chairman Neuer said that there was no testimony provided regarding the operation of the hotel. He said that Mr. McDonough stated in his
ustify this very substantial deviation from the Ordinance. Vice Chairman Neuer said that there was no testimony provided regarding the operation of the hotel. He said that Mr. McDonough stated in his testimony that there is no egress from the rear of the hotel and that is not true. Vice Chairman Neuer said that there is a back door at the hotel. Vice Chairman Neuer said that the hotel property is being reduced to one acre and the Township Ordinance requires a hotel to be on five (5) acres. He said that reducing the size of the lot increases the negative impact on the zone and the community. It is a substantial increase of an existing non-conforming use and no proofs have been submitted to support it.
Vice Chairman Neuer stated that the Board also needed to see a copy of any cross-easement agreements between the hotel and proposed Quick Chek properties, and they did not see it. Vice Chairman Neuer said that as long as he has been sitting on this Board, he has never seen an application come before them requesting twenty two (22) variances; he said the Board has approved one or two variances but never twenty two (22). Vice Chairman Neuer went on to explain some of the variances required for this application. He said that the building and impervious coverage will be increased, the lot is undersized for two uses even though the Township Ordinance permits two uses on one property in a B-2 zone. He went on to say there is a requirement that the fuel station must be 500’ away from a public building. Even though there was credible testimony regarding current safety requirements there was no testimony regarding other factors which would justify being in close proximity to both a school and public buildings, the Arena Complex. Vice Chairman Neuer stated the applicant did not prove why they wanted to squash two conditional uses into this site. He said that he also had concerns about pedestrian and vehicular circulation on the two proposed properties. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that he disagrees with the testimony provided that no one will be there between midnight and five (5) a.m. He said that there are no other gas stations in town that provide gas after midnight and if someone needs gas at that time their GPS will direct them to this site. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that leaving a car at the gas pump to go shopping is a pet peeve of his. He said that he believes that it is unsafe to walk through the lanes of traffic and blocking the lanes with your car. There was no credible evidence presented to allay these safety concerns which were stated on the record. Vice Chairman Neuer stated that these are his personal opinions and beliefs and he does this with a heavy heart, because Quick Chek is a company that will be welcome in this community, but he is compelled to vote yes to deny this application. Mr. Quentzel stated that he has been looking into the benefits of having a convenience store with fuel pumps on this site. He said they have made changes to the initial proposal, reducing the number of gas pumps and the square footage but, after listening to Vice
of having a convenience store with fuel pumps on this site. He said they have made changes to the initial proposal, reducing the number of gas pumps and the square footage but, after listening to Vice Chairman Neuer, he also feels that there is too much bulk use on that site. Mr. Quentzel said that he is concerned with safety issues because the site is across the street from the zoo and children trying to cross the street to get to the site is very dangerous. He said that this is very difficult for him and initially he was going to abstain from voting but, after listening to Vice Chairman Neuer on the record, he believes that this is too much for this site. Mr. Quintzel stated that this is not a good location and that he is voting yes to deny the application.
Mr. Steinhart stated that initially he thought this was a great idea and a compatible use, however, through testimony all the positives went away. He said traffic, specifically the turning movements in a highly congested area, was one of his concerns. Mr. Steinhart said that children running across the street to go to the Quick Chek would be very dangerous and he does not want to make it worse than it is now. He said a child is going to get hurt or possibly killed and he does not want to have that on his conscience if it does happen. Mr. Steinhart stated that Quick Chek did not want to present traffic volumes, as requested by the Board, stating that this information is proprietary and that bothered him. He said for them to not want to provide the Board with that information leads him to believe that this information could not be good. Mr. Steinhart voted yes to deny the application. Mr. Sussman stated that most bases were covered and that Vice Chairman Neuer covered his concerns. He said that traffic and congestion were his main concerns, specifically too many turning movements. Mr. Sussman said that a five (5) acre site for a hotel is required by Township Ordinance and the hotel site would be reduced to one acre. Mr. Sussman voted yes to deny the application. Chairman Buechler stated that he would have voted to approve this application with a number of conditions. He said that he wanted to state for the record that the twenty four (24) hour approval that was part of this application is determined by the Township’s Police Department and not this Board. Chairman Buechler said that the testimony of the Traffic Engineer was credible; he thinks that this project would not generate any more traffic because the traffic is already there. Chairman Buechler stated that he thinks that the neighbors are angry with the County, regarding the traffic in the area, and they are taking it out on Quick Chek. Chairman Buechler stated that in regards to the competition, this is not relevant criteria for this Board to determine their decision. Chairman Buechler stated that he would have conditioned approval by requiring that the applicant reduce the number of gas pumps. Chairman Buechler voted no to the proposed resolution. Bullock: Yes to Deny Schwarzbaum: - Gabry: Yes to Deny Steinhart: Yes to Deny D. Nash: - Sussman: Yes to Deny Neuer: Yes to Deny Weiss:
mps. Chairman Buechler voted no to the proposed resolution. Bullock: Yes to Deny Schwarzbaum: - Gabry: Yes to Deny Steinhart: Yes to Deny D. Nash: - Sussman: Yes to Deny Neuer: Yes to Deny Weiss: - Quentzel: Yes to Deny Chairman Buechler: No to proposed Resolution
Chairman Buechler stated for the record that this application has been denied by the Board. 2. ZB-14-08/Sai Hira Ram Trust, Inc. Carried from 5/21/15 Block: 177.02; Lots: 15.01 & 16; Zone: R-4 23-27 Laurel Avenue Seeking “D” and several “C” variances for converting two properties To use as a house of worship and related uses. EXHIBITS A-26 — Summary of Relief Requested dated 6/18/15 — prepared by Peter Steck O-1 — Photograph O-2 — Photograph Vice Chairman Neuer is recused from hearing this application and stepped down from the dais. Robert Williams, Esq., attorney for the applicant, approached the podium. Chairman Buechler stated that this application was last heard on May 21* and the Planner will present his testimony tonight. He said that the reason the Planner did not testify at the last meeting is because he was delayed in another community. Peter Steck approached the podium and was sworn under oath. Chairman Buechler stated that Mr. Steck has testified before this Board many times as a Professional Planner and is accepted as an expert in Professional Planning. Mr. Williams asked Mr. Steck if he evaluated the proposed site; he replied yes. Mr. Steck detailed the property and the existing conditions. He stated that the property has some slopes but is predominately a buildable piece of property. Mr. Steck stated that the applicant is seeking site plan approval which requires “d” and “c’ variances to establish a house of worship on a site consisting of two lots. He said that they originally wanted to maintain part of the existing building on lot 15.01 but because of comments from neighbors and the Board, they are now proposing to demolish the building. Mr. Steck detailed the new proposed building and what rooms will be in the building. Mr. Steck said that Thursdays and Sundays are the main days for people to come to worship and pray but there are three special days besides the regular days that people will come to worship. He said those special days are the Guru’s birthday, the Lunar New Year and Thanksgiving. Mr. Steck said that occupancy may peak during those special three days but they are anticipating the maximum attendance on the regular days will be no more than forty (40) people.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
83931cc267ac4,599,363 bytes