Supporting Documentation · Aug 15, 2024
325 Mount Pleasant Ave ZB 24 06 Planning Review August 12 2024
b7a5cc10c32b6b512bf7b0a0d91eba6b0f71e7a7d086f51d141abc87647791e8Indexed text · page 13
Show all pages13 | Page 105 Grove Street, Suite 3 Montclair, NJ 07042 www.Nishuanegroup.com 973.954.2677 (c) 1: in cases of hardship, such as “exceptional narrowness, shallowness or shape of specific piece of property,” or by reason of exceptional or unique topographic conditions, physical features, or an exceptional situation uniquely affecting a specific piece of property or the structures lawfully existing thereon. (c) 2: where the purposes of zoning would be advanced, and the benefits derived by the variance would outweigh any detriments. The applicant must also meet the negative criteria of the statute for the granting of a “c” variance, wherein a variance can be granted only “without substantial detriment to the public good” and where it “will not substantially impair the intent and the purpose of the zone plan and zoning ordinance.” Conclusions Respectfully submitted, George Wheatle Williams, PP, AICP Principal, Nishuane Group, LLC. Erik DeLine, PP, AICP, LEED AP Associate, Nishuane Group, LLC.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
b7a5cc10c32b1,782,238 bytes