Supporting Documentation · Nov 6, 2024
31 35 Harrison Avenue West Orange Planner Report 9 6 2024
cc380b64a31099a20876f358c37ccb23148343cbf859db534bd1c1d6284b4eebIndexed text · page 10
Show all pagesSeptember 6, 2024 Page 10 of 11 PB-24-15 31-35 Harrison Avenue Block 141, Lot 1 105 Grove Street, Suite 3, Montclair, NJ 07042 ∙ Phone: (973) 954-2677 ∙ www.NishuaneGroup.com ingress/egress will be used, that makes the 8-foot width necessary. Testimony should also include any alternative configuration that were considered to facilitate the desired width. For example, was angling the doorway considered? Or stepping the southern façade of the addition back to the required setback, beyond the southeastern area of the proposed doorway. The applicant indicates in their application that one (1) parking space is proposed on-site, on the southern side of the building. This area is also identified as a driveway, which will access the proposed 8-foot-wide ingress/egress in the addition. As the driveway will be used to access the delivery/pick-up area, it will not be appropriate for use as an on-site parking space. Notwithstanding the one (1) identified on-site parking space that will be located in the driveway, the applicant is deficient by seventeen (17) off-street parking spaces. This is a substantial deficiency which can have a substantial adverse impact on the surrounding area, as parking on Harrison Avenue in this area is prohibited on the opposite side of the street from the subject site. The applicant should provide testimony addressing this parking deficiency and the impact it will have in the surrounding area. Recommended Conditions of Approval Should the Board be inclined to grant the requested variance relief in full or in part, or to approve the accompanying site plan, the following are recommended conditions that should be placed on the approvals. 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations provided by the Board Engineer. 2. The applicant shall provide testimony as to how garbage and recycling will be collected and how delivery/loading and pick-up activities will be managed. 3. No lighting or stormwater plans have been provided. The applicant shall provide additional lighting and drainage details, illustrating that neither has a negative impact on the adjoining properties. 4. The applicant shall provide testimony as to exactly how the proposed 8-foot-wide ingress/egress door in the southeastern area of the addition will be used. Testimony shall also include any alternative configurations that were considered to facilitate the desired width of
foot-wide ingress/egress door in the southeastern area of the addition will be used. Testimony shall also include any alternative configurations that were considered to facilitate the desired width of the door. For example, was angling the doorway considered? Or stepping the southern façade of the addition back to the required setback, beyond the southeastern area of the proposed doorway?
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
cc380b64a3101,847,483 bytes