Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · Nov 14, 2024

04_AECOM_Environmental Report_Final

Preserved file SHA-256294edc1f118d9afed4a8864a2ccbcd5a5f84aa0bf548820a10a2c5f2279b4083

Indexed text

Page 171

General Chemistry Raw Data Report Job ID: 140-37968-1 Batch: 89964 Analyst Initials: SJF Method: 5 Instrument: NONE [ Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-2 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit |_Particulates, Total None 4 3985 ug/Semple Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-7 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit Particulates, Total None 1 3000 ug/Sample Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-12 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 1 11690 ug/Sample [ Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-17 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 1 -85 ug/Sample [ Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-26 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 1 8115 ug/Sample [ Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-30 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit Particulates, Total None 4 215 ug/Sample Lab Sample ID; 140-37968-A-1 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 1 4650 ugiSample Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-6 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 1 4165 ug/Sample Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-11 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 1 2080 ug/Sample [ Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-16 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit |_Particulates, Total None 41 430 ug/Sample [ Lab Sample ID: 140-37968-A-25 Analysis Date: Aug 12, 2024 10:56 Analyte Detector Dilution Raw Result Unit | Particulates, Total None 4 1400 ug/Sample Eurofins Knoxville Page 80 of 88 8/21/2024 12:21:54 PM

Page 172

TestAmerica Knoxville High Volume Particulate Filter Gross Weight Data Analyst SFBTNE Balanea Model _ Metin Tolexte: XSE2NSDU weight date; 85/2024 = 8/15/2024 85/2024 Balance SN: Ate417295 Temp °C: 224 weight time| 1045 | i448 | Bs, Methad: 5 method 5 % Humidity: a Particulates WARNING report not finalized woud Type Lnssompeio | UMSTxe | Fiter | To wiign |Ses5 Nein | Gross Weight] cross Neth] cross WASH! oes weigh| Refer | a oe | Teme | Tene [Humid] Humility | riclte viight Sample ID Number i 4 2 3 4 @ Ajima) Tare |Tolerance| Tara |Tolerance} (otal pg) FRivferenes Weight 0. 1g A.NRARS: ANBAR 4 oK Refersnce Weight Sq 4.93975 4.39374 0.24 OK [Reference Weight 190g 99.99910 G9.9GRBO 1.29 OK Zero Check 0.09090. 0.90909 4.09 OK risen RERE ST Tia [aaa | atsas2 | 08ers tos [8 ag Filler Meight 440-37908-B? 712845 0.50735 051026 951949 O44 OK 3006] Filter sight AAD-37365A12 712847 0.51434 D52634 0.52512 6.52503] 0.18 OK 11590} Fiervcett Taras [aap esse a sins [ asia [sare eau — ast ta a Fle visaht ag srsepoy | —astig aan [a siege [ase s5nn espe] gas To sits e-eai C= esr ose [or 2 tras WaT a kD as [Refersnce Weight Sq 493977 4.39378 4.93978 4.99978 22 OK [Relerence Weigh! 190g 98.39900 99.99330 99,99920] 0.39 OK 2a Sheek eoni6| v0) [ox sist ate |S steve] ato Filler eight 5814742 3814838 63, 14859) 0.13 OK Filter visi 149-3796 %-A-11, 9.06111 0.06339 £5,95319) 0.49 OK rv TaATOO RT SBR [ARTETA | ARH a a Filter Vieight 140-37383-A-25 ‘8424982 33.25134 63.25143 63.25122] 048 OK [Reference Weight 0.14 0.19090 0.99994 0.05999 0.99999] 0.01 OK fisteaea Wasnt agama [anima | a ints] — nasa [References Weight 190g 99.89960 98.99890 99.9996 98.9990) 1.09 OK [Zera Check 0.09090 0.90909 6.09090 6.90006] 0.09 OK weight set 9 Fle Name Print 672024 feds AM ZAP Trani\Agrinss_hateh_27240812 inu5) version 4.4 Pago 1 aft Page 81 of 8 8/21/2024 12:21:54 PM

Page 173

Method(s): Analyst: Ms /M202. m6 {TaP Balance ID: Date (mm/dd/yyyy): AS 08/157 2624 Sample ID: Volume (mL): YO- 21 A- | [ey HO- 379 ye 4-3 [12% HO- 370g -A-4 | HS. 5 Ho- 37110 Aol o3-% HO-2 14s - A | [At HO-s70%-Ag | HPO Ho-sios-A-) {| ioF.F HO- PUFA 1a | WAS 4 HO- St -A-H | 32.0 Ho-aMs AW | Sty WH 2 4 -A 1% UBS (40-3 Piss-A -P 32.0 10-379 0%-A-1| 82.2 HO-270Y- A= 27 \a75 WO-S AWS -A = 25% Ze.” Page 82 of 88 8/21/2024 12:21:54 PM

Page 174

Eurofins Knoxville Particulate Matter Determination Data Review/Narrative Checklist Method: SW-846 Method 0050 by SOP KNOX-WG-0006, Rev. 14 Batch Number: 89964 | Job Number(s): | 37968 Analyst Name: SFB/TMB | Method Citation fms OMSB OMS! OM17 OM201A CCTN-039 Dother Drying Filters D Ambient 105°C 0 160°C. O Other. Temperature Probe & Nozzle Rinses OD Ambient 4 105°C 0 160°C C Other Review items Section 1: Calibration A Y | .N | IfNo, why is data reportable? 1. Was the daily balance calibration check performed and recorded in the x x balance calibration check log hook? 2. Was the balance zero and calibration checked with three weights that 4 bracket the range to he measured immediately prior to use? 3. Was balance calibration checked with a bracketing weight above the x x highest sample weight once per 10 samples and at end of weighing 0 Another weight was used.( grams} session? 4. Was balance zero checked per 10 samples and at end of weighing session? 2nd y 5. Was the balance tared before each weighing? x 6. Was the balance ID documented? >| ><] ><! >< 7._ If used, was the oven ID documented? x Section 2: Tare Weight Procedure 1. Were filters and/or beakers weighed in FilterTracl¥? x 2. Was a TALS job created for tracking the tared filters and their weights? * 3. Was tare weight data uploaded to TALS? | ><| >< | >< 4, Were all sample weights performed in duplicate (at least)? 4 Section 3: Sample Procedure 5. Were all special project requirements met? (Review all Backlog Comments and Project Documents.) 6. Were sample |Ds verified? (Review Filter [D, Job Numbers and Client {0s on sample labels.) 7. Was tare weight data entered directly from TALS? Jf no, scan documents for tare weights. 8. Were all sample weights performed in duplicate (at least}? [re] | |r 9. Was the average of the last two weights used? >< |><|>«| ><) x] xX ). Calculations checked for error? Sample 37848-4-1 (Weight 1 + Weight 2) /2 = 83543739 x Gross Weight Averqge — Tare Weight Average = 0.001659 Section 4: TALS Reporting 41. Was Equipment ID entered? x 2. Is the correct analyst name recorded? x 3. Does analytical date time match last weighing sequence in FilterTraclv? nd 4. Did FilterTraclV correctly upload data to TALS? x 5. Were applicable documents scanned and added? x 6. Are all non-conformances documented? x NCM No.: NCM No.: x [5893(M5)] _

Page 174

n FilterTraclv? nd 4. Did FilterTraclV correctly upload data to TALS? x 5. Were applicable documents scanned and added? x 6. Are all non-conformances documented? x NCM No.: NCM No.: x [5893(M5)] _ (6053(201A)] _[18822(5A}] _ [23035(039)] _ [Other] | ><) ><! >K | >« | ><] ><) 7. Was appropriate narrative NCM added? 8. Final report acceptable? (Results, units, analysis dates are correct. Flags and/or errors were addressed.) Pad 1*t Level Reviewer: SFB Date: 8/46/2024 2"4 Level Reviewer: OCW | Date: 8/20/24. Comments: Comments: Page 83 of 88 WC197R3, 99/08/2894 /2024 12:21:54 PM

Page 175

* Such action must be taken in consultation with client. Page 84 of 88 8/21/2024 12:21:54 PM

Page 176

Shipping and Receiving Documents Page 85 of 88 8/21/2024 12:21:54 PM

Page 177

A=COM Chain of Custody Record Filterable and condensable particulate Page 3 of 4 Page 86 of 88 Project 7 Wonder Smokehouse Testing Site 2 Wonder NJ 3 Project & Number 60735150 © 5 Prepared Be =o by Ce 1 Nenitean a2 g Ze = Sample 1D Code sample Matrix Date/Time |= = 3/2 ao = = Comments | WondStk-Stk-1-M5/202-PNR Probe and Nozzle ig ase [8° | WandStk-Stk-1-M5/202-Filt Filter EAS j IWondStk-Stk-1-M5/202- Water Rinse SL h WirRns WondStk-Stk-1-M5/202- Organic Rinse xf & lOrgRns WondStk-Stk-1-M5/202- CPM Filter Of bh CPMFilt ! WondStk-Stk-2-M5/202-PNR | ProkeandNowle | $77 i Rinse i ~*MondStk-Stk-2-M5/202-Filt Fitter x7e \ cgi i a WondStk-Stk-2-M5/202- Water Rinse Y/E WirRns ii, IWondStk-Stk-2-M5/202- Organic Rinse i {é K OrgRns Hl f od Il IWondStk-Stk-2-MS/202- CPM Fitter S7/E H aesrans on 37968 Chain of Custody af Custody: CPMFilt H WondStk-Stk-3-M5/202-PNR | PrabeandNozde [377-9 ? Rinse Ni H WondStk-Stic3-M15/202-Filt Filter x7 i WondStk-Stk-3-M5/202- WarerRinse [7 J | WirRns j nod WondStk-Stk-3-M5/202- OrganicRinse | YF f [ NO CosTWY GAS OrgRns ASCENT Abert Rianne WondStk-Stk-3-M5/202- CPM Filter VIF TG Th ab-a'L - i CPMFilt dy 8434 Remarks: Provide results in total milligams per s2mple. Provice raw data package Relinquished Sy: Date/Time Relinquished by: Date/Time Relinguished by: Date/Time CT ho wm Afr ¥ fay fkege Received “\ Date/Time Received by: Date/iime Received by: Date/Time Meg Preana 18-94 VAD _,damarks (Laboratory Only) : 8/21/2024 42:24:54 PM

Page 178

A =COM Chain of Custody Record . : Filterable and condensable particulate Page Lo Jroject . Wonder Smokehouse Testing Site 2 Wonder NJ = Project 8 oO Number 60735150 : Prepared ® fr = by Covhaynsany 38 a Se 3 Sample !D Code Sample Matrix | Date/Time = 3 3 Pa c aa x comments WondStk-Stk-FB-MIS/202-PNR | Probe and Nozzle ave (SAT |X ia WondStk-Stk-FB-M5/202-Filt Filter 7, 17 |WondStk-Stk: FB-M5/202- Water Rinse — Ww / XZ ‘rRns: WandStk-Stk-F8-M5/202- Organic Rinse ~ OrgRns Sti) i lWondStk-Stk-FB-MS/202- CPM Filter { H CPMFilt ¥ 7 WondStk-Stk-RB-M5/202-Ace Acetone oF 7 ““WondStk-Stk-RB-M5/202-Hex Hexene x7 j mw AR Sake de Prete culreanl Ye [| ASHSa- PAE ia i WondStk-Stk-RB-MS/202-Filt Filter S/ 7 WondStk-Stk-RB-M5/202- Water 7 Water eT | WondStk-Stk-RB-M5/202- CPM Filter CPMeilt —~ 1 4 ~~ aL DRG - Pithe- Sy } j MSBA ANY H Wf oe Sh AS [ode x | Mel n?'n Lie Ras a if “in dn hom ds ~~ Sm of Seen Hes | ¥ / 4 \ MS2O2. — Grndng : i ~ 44% CIs la & z NYA LI BPing Remarks: Provide results in total milligrams per sample. Provide raw data package Relinguishe by: "Date/Time Relinquisned by: Date/Time Relinquished by: [Date/Time TT Learn been) SP Hoy {hie Recaived by: ‘ Date/Time Received by: Date/Time Received by: Date/Time , ea Wed Remarks {Laboratory Only) : - ; Bye ma E . Page 87 of 88 8/21/2024 42:21:54 PM _

Page 179

EUROFINS KNOXVILLE SAMPLE RECEIPT/CONDITION UPON RECEIPT ANOMALY CHECKLIST Log In Number: Loc: 140 37968 Review Items Na Tf No, what was the prablem? Comments/Actions Taken Are the shipping containers intact? ia} Containers, Broken 2, Were ambient air containers received intact? 0 Checked in lab The cooters/cuntainers custody seal if present, is it intact? O Yes O NA 4. Ts the cooler temperature within limits? (> freezing _ temp. of water to 6 °C, VOST: 10°C) ‘Thermometer ID +§¢7 iy . Correction factor: _4.2'¢ NUN O Covler Out of ‘Temp, Client Contacted, Proceed/Cancel O Cooler Out of Temp, Same Day Receipt 5. Were all of the sample containers reecived intact? O Containers, Broken 6. Were samples received in appropriate containers? O Containers, Improper; Client 7, Do sample container labels match COC? (Ds, Dates, Times) Contacted; Proceed/Cancel O COC & Samples Do Not Match 0 COC incorrect/Incomplete O COC Not Received 8. Were all of the samples listed on the COC received? O Sample Received, Not on COC O Sample on COC, Not Received 9. Ts the date/time of sample collection noted? O COC; No Date/Time; Client Contacted 10, Was the sampler identified on the COC? UO Sampler Not Listed on COC 11. Is the client and project name/# identified? O COC Incorrect/Incomplete Labeling Verified by: Date: DH test strip lot number: 12. Are tests/parameters listed for cach sample? O COC No tests on COC | 13, Is the matrix of the samples noted? G COC Incorrcet/Incomplete 14. Was COC relinquished? (Signed/Dated/Timed) (e.g. 1613B, 1668) Chlorine test strip lot number: O Residual Chlorine 19, For 1613B water samples is pH<9? O Ifno, notify lab to adjust 20. For rad samples was sample activity info, Provided? 0 COC Incorrect/Incomplete Box 16A: pH | Box 18A: Residual ae Preservation Chlorine __15. Were samples received within holding time’? - O Holding Time - Receipt Preservative: 16, Were samples received with curreet chemical / O pH Adjusted, pH Mneluded Lot Number: Preservative (excluding Encore)? (See box 16A) Exp Date: . . Tuwcorrect Preservative Analyst: 17, Were VOA samples received without headspace? D Headspace (VOA only) Date: 18. Did you check for residual chlorine, if necessary? Time. Project #: ..__ PM Instructions: __ . fay Sample Receiving Associate: __ fw idem QA026R33.doe, 11/10/23 8/21/2024 Page 88 of

File revisions (1)