04_AECOM_Environmental Report_Final

Eurofins Knoxville Particulate Matter Determination Data Review/Narrative Checklist Method: EPA Method 202 by SOP KNOX-WG-0006, Rev, 14 Batch Number: 89834, 89835 Job Number(s}: 37968 Analyst Name: SFB/TMB/TGR Method Citation: M202 Drying Filters O Ambient O Other. Temperature Inorganic CPE (202) 2 Ambient O Other. Organic CPE (202) (Ambient 0 Other. Extracted and Combined per Method 292 Review Items Section 1: Calibration NIA If No, why is data reportable? 1. Was the daily balance calibration check performed and recorded in the balance calibration check log book? 2. Was the balance zero and calibration checked with three weights that bracket the range to be measured prior to use? were used, C Other weights bracketing weight range 3. Was the balance checked with 100 gram weight per 10 samples and at the end of weighing session? C Another weight was used. grams) . Was the balance zero checked per 10 samples and at the end of weighing session? . Was the balance tared before each weighing? . Was the oven ID documented? 4. 6. §. Was the balance ID documented? 7. 8. . Was pH paper ID documented? [>< >< [><] | |< ]>¢]><]><] >< | ><] o¢ [A 2 Section 2; Tare Weight Procedure 1. Were the beakers weighed in TALS batch? 4 FilterTracl¥ 2. Were the beakers baked before weighing? 3. Were all tare weights performed in duplicate? beakers. Duplicate weights not required for baked 4. Were all tare weights averaged? >} ><} ><) >< Section 3: Procedure 1. Were all special project requirements met? (Review all Backlog Comments and Project Documents.) 2. Were sample IDs verified? (Review Job Numbers and Client IDs on sample labels.) 3. Were all sample weights performed in duplicate (at least)? 4. Was the average of the last two weights used? be PX [| Calculations checked for error? Sample 9796*3-18 (Weight 1 + Weight 2)/2= 8.31479 Gross Weight Average - Tare Weight Average = ¥°1S459 > | ><] ><] ><] >« Section 4: TALS Reporting . Was Batch Information added? Correct analyst name recorded? Does the analytical time match the beginning of the last set of weights? .. Were applicable documents scanned and added? NCM No.: . Was appropriate narrative NCM added? x NCM No: _x [6054] 1 2. 3. 4. Are all non-conformances documented? 8. 6. . Final report acceptable? (Results, units, analysis dates are correct. Flags and/or errors were

iate narrative NCM added? x NCM No: _x [6054] 1 2. 3. 4. Are all non-conformances documented? 8. 6. . Final report acceptable? (Results, units, analysis dates are correct. Flags and/or errors were addressed.) BS XK | <1>« | ><] >K | >< 15 Level Reviewer: SFB Date: 8/20/2024 2 Level Reviewer: DCW Date: 8/20/24 Comments: Comments: Page 79 of 88 WC106RS, 09/08/22 8/21/2024 12:21:54 PM