Supporting Documentation · Jan 22, 2025
THEWAYMAKER SITE PLAN APPLICATION 91824
de07971534c9eac31a13826633f4ef7e557ce0d4b6703a8d2a0941c4497a94baIndexed text
“TN NOISS: WIN x x vin | * x x VIN VIN vin |” . wa é | Q woneonddy 4
Span | g JO joaus UBbiseq 9g BuLeauiBuy sialo9 Aq pasedaid sueiq 88S | “AL pUue II JO} ubiseg 9 BueauiBug sialjoD Aq pesedeid suejq 89g SUUVGNVLS Ad ONY ONTO TAM ATEVNIVASOAS ti | Gieay yo i_aUISNMOL -
See Drainage Reference on last page TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE 66 Main Street, West O; WS 07082 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT JOHN F. McKEON Mayor SUSAN BORG ALLA, Planning Director September 16, 1998 Stephen Geffner, Esq Gallo, Gefiner, Fenster, PC 411 Hackensack Avenue Hackensack, NJ 07601 RE PB-98-11 / Highview at West Orange Prospect Avenue Dear Mr. Gefther Enclosed please find a copy of the resolution that was adopted at the September 2, 1998 West Orange Planning Board meeting. In addition, please submit eight (8) sets of plans for signature. Signed site plans are required prior to the issuance of Building Permits If you have any questions. piease Jet me know Yours truly, (Caspr. F Migdalia Wagner Planning Board Secretary Enclosure cc Mayor John McKeon Police Chief James Abbott Fire Director John Ryan Thomas Biondi, Construction Official Director Leonard Lepore, Municipal Kim Ragoni, Zoning Officer Kevin Dillon, Tax Assessor ecinetwork'iplanning bréwp\correspo'PB-981 1 tes
PB 98-11 RESOLUTION of the PLANNING BOARD TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY for Approval of a Majer Subdivision Submitted by Highview at West Orange, L.L.C. for Vacant Land Known as Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Block 107. n for preliminar ¢ plan approval and requested x subdivision approval has been made io the Planning Board of the ("A Applicant") on Township of West Orange ("Board") by hview at West Orange, lands known and designated as Block 107. Lots 2,3 & 4 as depicted on the Tax Maps of the ¢ hearing was held before this Board on June 3. 1998 with regard Gefiner Fenster, P.C_ ith statutory requirements of publication due or delinguent with £ and service o. respect to the subject premises: and P Pp € of the Board have been of the Towns of West Orange make flaw with regard to
ication (collectively a. b. a a New Jersey" prepared by i998. The following documents, Reports"), were also considered by the Board: Statement Environmental Impact March 23, 1998 prepared by EcolSciences. 1998, dated March 23, Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. Report of Lake Management contai within the Environmental Impact Statement dated March 1998 by EcolSciences, Inc. Ordinance adopted amendi and supplementing Chapter 25 ef the Revised Ordinan: General s of the Township of . 1997, West Orange dated October ment Developer's Town ant and the 1907 dated November 2 Resolutions of the Plannin Langan Engineering and Environment with the aforesaid
Director. 1998 were mark: eth herein. . Plans. Report Townhouse Courtyard Court Elevati nl Clubhouse elevation Playhouse Floor Plan Right Side Court Ei Site Plan (03/23/98) e Plan Previously Approved Y App Plan g exhibits (collectively ' hibits" . Sign to Guardhouse tion
greement and the Ordinance. be utilized for mixed purposes townnomes. a 100.000 sq.ft. o an amphitheater to be erected on land to be donated to Township. 5. The Applicant’s proposal was explained by Stephen A. Geffher. project ineer and traffic engineer: Edward Lothian, licens Blake, AIA and professional planner; Michael §. Friedman, + gistered ecolo, Joseph Gurkovich, P.E: and Marshai cher. one of the principals of the Applicant. ToT 6, Mr, Lothian testified and described the ; is application. ant intends particularly set forth in the plans attached 8. The Applicant intends to construct one 100,000 sq.ft. office buiiding on Lot tends to bu 1,03. The Applicant i a gated townhouse development. consisting of a t 150 units in clusters on Lot 2.01 1.04. The Applicant intends to construct a house/amphitheater to he know! The Oscar Schindler Cer _ on Lot 1.02 to be donated to the i Site Plan communi! and relate ied lots and futur c e. location of the wetlands and ¢ the removal of E impose ed with respect to tra
. Lothian on-site parking and the potential for 2 future he thi ecessary, and the par both the office building erforming arts center. censed architect retained by the Applicant, described the He further testified to the exterior appearance for ribed the use of brie! the front and rear elev , stone and g beautiful facade which will ment the adjoining townhouse community. He respo h respect to the rear e ibed par the concerns of the Planning Director particularly ¥ i Avenue and Route 280. He desc: is somewhat skewed toward 4 ion of the site and some 26 location of stalls and the location of the building in the lowest po feet lower than the nearest townhouse. He further described that all roof mechanical e clions by architectural screen! He also testi 2 p 5 a 5 G 8 Z. 5 a z chitecture. that the wetlands places 1 Lake. Friedman. testified both as to osal concerning Cr the developm: and tc his study and management prof that the ed as set forth upon the site plan as a result ¢ He did. however. indicate that there would be green space and undisturbed and debr: as to clean the lake perimeter ‘rom 0,006.00 t to the Developer's tenance of Crystal Lake. ni pr nd eve . shrubs and the nearest lownhouse cluster.
2 significant b reed to the review io the Directors request. the Ay n of the landscape plan h her and to provide for reasonable roposed plan throughout the site where necessary. Particular attention was paid to the rear elevation of the office building and the area surroundi He furthe the pl. g lot the lanes would be terrace There wiil be ce building parki rs placed at the en Bp permit for at ndscaped area. ich further testified with respect to the | ile and recommended 1 h decorative poles. {halide lig of Pore, had some concern about the type and However, the Township F: lighting if the Township were required to replace them when damaged. Jt was. therefore. hand Mr. LaPore that they would work together to provide for greed upon by Mr. ighting on the site nning 18. Mr 2 was qua! variances ction with this several ony with respect 4 variances @ ation. The reques 5 4 4
©. that would. in effect, create iances on the interior o articular site and to allow for Ships imposed upon the applicant on this all of the uses which were requested. In addition. as a result of the adoption of the Developer's Agreement and the Ordinance, the {ot sizes were fixed as was the density and location of each of the proposed With respect to the parking surrounding the office building, there were four r of parking spaces, Mr. Gurkovich testified that in his ng space for every 250 fi ‘ide for an alternative of a p With respect to parking nec of the build its proximity southwest portion of the property because of of parking would have to be to the front of the build parking lot would be approximately 20 feet below the nearest townhouse. that there was nd throughout the parking lot ion for all. t to the 18°. there would also be a two foot > described this nece urther testifie
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
de07971534c92,207,970 bytes