Prior Resolutions of Approval submission

and that the special reasons were to make the operation more meaningful and more useful to the Applicant which would promote the general welfare without any detriment. The next witness was Charles J. Stewart, licensed engineer and surveyor, who testified to the engineering aspects involved and referred to the copy of the plan which was marked A-6 and described the site. He indicated that there would be proper landscaping pursuant to a plan that was submitted to the Township Planner and that evergreen planting in the rear would constitute a buffer and that they will reconfigure the sidewalk and parking area so as to save the existing trees. The existing hedge along the pavement shall be eliminated and the lighting to be added shall match that which is there. He pointed out that the drainage was satisfactory by using the existing detention basin with a new storm drainage inlet and new pipelines to tie in. He further indicated that the existing entrance for two way traffic onto Prospect Avenue and onto the driveway along the property line would provide safe ingress and egress for use by persons coming there; and WHEREAS, various members of the Board questioned the various witnesses and their attorney; and WHEREAS, the testimony and report of Susan Borg, Township Planner, and the testimony and report of Allan J. Palmere, Assistant Municipal Engineer, were considered; and WHEREAS, no one else appeared in favor of the application and no one else appeared either opposed to the application and no one else testified either for or against the application; and WHEREAS, all the facts and data contained in the submitted application and all the 5