2025 10 27 Response to Zoning and SPRAB

3 3. The Site Data Chart on SP-1 indicates that the Owner and Applicant is Panorama LLC whereas the application form shows that the Applicant is Panorama, LLC and the Owner is Thea LLC. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The plans have been revised to show the owner as Thea, LLC (See Sheet SP-1). 4. SP-4 includes a callout which states that pervious asphalt pavement is proposed for the drive aisle and parking spaces. However, sheet SP-10 includes a Granite Block Curb & Pavement Detail which shows that standard (non-pervious) pavement is proposed. This discrepancy must be resolved. PETRY RESPONSE: The plans have been revised to reflect the standard pavement since the soils are currently dense, and the bedrock is high making pervious pavement impractical (See Sheet SP-4). 5. If a pervious pavement system is proposed, then a pervious pavement detail must be added to the plans. The detail must indicate the seasonal high-water table elevation and the bottom of the stone storage bed elevation to ensure sufficient separation is provided. The detail should also indicate the locations of filter fabric. In addition, the detail must clarify if the pervious pavement system will be an infiltration system or an under drained system and the appropriate details must be added to the plans. PETRY RESPONSE: The plans have been revised to call out asphalt pavement throughout; thus, a pervious pavement detail is not required (See Sheet SP-4). 6. The Test Pit Locations and Soil Permeability Map included in the Drainage Statement includes soil testing information that was completed on January 8, 2025, by Johnson Soils Company. Therefore, a copy of the soil investigation report should be provided to the Board and to our office. PETRY RESPONSE: A copy of the Soil Investigation Report has been added to the Drainage Statement. 7. The plans should be revised to include construction details for the following site improvements: a) Do Not Enter Sign;