Letter from Engineer to Board Secretary 01292026 4913 0296 5901 v1

Preliminary and Final Major Site Plan 575 Northfield Ave., LLC Block 159.01, Lot 1.01 January 29, 2026 Page 5 of 9 C. TRAFFIC COMMENTS 1. The Applicant should address the Board regarding whether the proposed tandem parking is permitted within the B-2 District. RESPONES-The B-2 District is silent on Tandem Spaces however, the IH-1 district indicates “Parking, which shall be permitted to be structured or surface, and further provided that tandem parking shall be permitted where such spaces are assigned to the same unit.” The intent for the subject project is consistent and the tandem spaces will be assigned to a single unit such that they operate similar to a single family home with a 2 car driveway or driveway/garage combination. 2. The Applicant should address the Board regarding whether the use of the proposed amenities including the zen garden, amenity/co-working space, gym, lounge, and club room will be restricted to apartment tenants only. RESPONES-The amenity spaces will be for the use of residential tenants only. The commercial space is the only portion of the building not restricted to residents. 3. There is a discrepancy between sheet C-002 of the civil plans and the traffic impact study regarding the parking space requirement for the commercial use and the total required parking spaces for the development. The discrepancy must be resolved. RESPONES- The Civil Plans identify the EV parking spaces as additive to the proposed physical parking spaces whereas the Traffic Impact Study applies the EV credit to the baseline requirement. The net result is the same, an exceedance of the parking requirement by one (1) space. (180 physical spaces vs. 179 required with EV credit or 200 spaces provided with EV credit vs. 199 spaces required). 4. The loading space shown on sheet C-300 of the civil plans must be revised to demonstrate that the space has a length of 40 feet and 14 feet of overhead clearance. RESPONES-The loading area is not required per the Township ordinance because of the size of the retail space D. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMMENTS 1. The civil and architectural plans must be revised to show the location, diameter, material, slope and invert of the proposed roof leaders and how the collected roof runoff gets discharged off-site. RESPONES-Provided on utility plan 2. The grading on sheet C-400 of the civil plans must be revised to show the parking lot

osed roof leaders and how the collected roof runoff gets discharged off-site. RESPONES-Provided on utility plan 2. The grading on sheet C-400 of the civil plans must be revised to show the parking lot north and east of the commercial space will have positive drainage off of the site. RESPONES-Provided 3. The varying invert elevations of the trench drain on sheet C-500 of the civil plans should be revised to reflect the proposed slope within the trench drain as shown in its respective detail on sheet C-902 of the civil plans. RESPONES-Provided