Prior Resolutions of Approval submission

that during home football games that parking monitors be utilized for the on-site parking in order to maintain the flow of traffic and safety. Mr. Staigar opined that there was safe ingress and egress to the Subject Property, and the Board so finds. 33. The Board finds that the practice of Seton Hall students walking from the school building to the athletic fields will likely continue even if the Application is denied. The Board finds it cannot require Seton Hall to install sidewalks on property it does not own to enable students to walk from the Seton Hall Prep school to the Subject Property, although Seton Hall is encouraged to take these issues to heart and instruct its students on how to walk properly to avoid any problems and to utilize sidewalks where they exists. This pre-existing issue of students walking to and from the Subject Property does not negate Mr. Staigar’s conclusion that there is safe ingress and egress from the Subject Property 34. With regard to the site plan itself, with the various revisions made by Seton Hall, and the relocation of certain of the baseball fields, the practice field on the northerly portion of the Subject Property will now be at least 380 feet from the boundary of the Carp and Malanga properties, and that buffer area will be heavily wooded with the exception of the path which is used for people to walk and cross-country track. Such a buffer is more than adequate, especially in light of Seton Hall's agreement not to do any further development in this northern portion for 30 years (assuming it continues to own the -34-