Supporting Documentation · Aug 12, 2026
062626 PB25 09 68 Whittlesey Ave Planning Review 2
c2bab90d1794c513f79d9f10191dc16aed53d4dbad113189887ce731d30d1131Indexed text · page 6
Show all pagesMemorandum Page 6 of 8 236 BROAD STREET, RED BANK, NJ 07701 • TEL 732.741.2900 • FAX 732.741.2929 • MAIL@HGAPA.COM • www.HGAPA.com d. Building Height: No elevation drawings were provided, and the height of the proposed two-family dwelling is not provided. Applicant should provide the height of the proposed dwelling and elevation drawings to determine compliance with height and story requirements. e. Minimum Residential Area: Per § 25-9.8a7, two-family dwellings are required to provide a minimum of 1,100 square feet of floor area per unit. Applicant to confirm the space provided per unit of the proposed dwellings or provide architectural plans which show the area provided. f. Impervious Coverage: The updated subdivision plan, with no revision date, depicts driveways and parking areas for each of the proposed lots. The impervious coverage calculations provided in the Bulk Standards Table appear to underestimate the conditions proposed in the drawing. For example, the proposed conditions for Lot 58.02 include additional impervious surfaces compared to the previously submitted plan (dated 12-17-2025), but the percentage of lot coverage did not increase from 28% in the undated revised plan. Based on approximate measurements done by our office, the lot coverage for Lot 58.02 appears to be over 50%. Applicant shall provide a breakout of the impervious surfaces, including building coverage. g. Sheds: As indicated in the subdivision plan, one detached shed, located to the rear of existing lot, is to remain in proposed Lot 58.02. It currently sits within the side yard setback at 7.11’ from the property line, which does not comply with the provisions of § 25-8.1a, stating that accessory uses shall not be located within the minimum required side yard. The Applicant should confirm if the structure is included in the impervious coverage calculation. Further, the shed is not shown on the proposed plan despite it being labeled as, “to remain.” Applicant to include all existing to remain structures on the proposed minor subdivision plan, and Applicant to confirm if any sheds or accessory structures are proposed for Lot 58.01. h. Fences: The Applicant must comply with the requirements for fences in § 25-8.4, including that solid fencing in the rear and side yards should be less than 6 feet in height, and fencing that is less than 50% solid in the front yard should be less
uirements for fences in § 25-8.4, including that solid fencing in the rear and side yards should be less than 6 feet in height, and fencing that is less than 50% solid in the front yard should be less than 4 feet in height. The Applicant shall confirm the height of the fences in order to determine compliance. i. Tree Requirements: The proposed subdivision indicates the removal of several trees, but no tree replacement plan or approval from the Township Forester has been provided as part of the application materials, as required per § 28-4. The Applicant must submit a Tree Removal and Replacement Application, a tree replacement plan, and a Tree Removal Neighbor Notification Form. j. Parking Requirements: To determine parking compliance, the Applicant shall provide the number of bedrooms per proposed unit. If the number of bedrooms is not specified, the requirement of 2.5
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
c2bab90d1794608,316 bytes