26 08 28 Mavis Tire Planning Review 4 rcd 8 28 2026

Page 8 of 11 encouraged to parking in the spaces accessed from Blueberry Bend rather than the spaces closest to the building. n. The applicant has requested a variance for having the drive aisle setback as 0 feet from a side yard where 5 feet is required. We note that the property’s southern side lot line is actually the centerline of Blueberry Bend, a private road, making any drive aisle providing access to the roadway technically in violation of the code. o. It does not appear that any sidewalk is proposed for the Prospect Avenue frontage of the site. While this is an existing condition, we note that there is sidewalk along the frontage immediately north of this site, and to the south as well. This property and the immediate neighbor to the south represent an existing gap in the sidewalk network that could be partially addressed through this development. The applicant has updated the design to provide concrete sidewalks along the site frontage within the right of way. p. The applicant should address the location of the trash/recycling enclosure and whether the cement walls will abut the principal building. The applicant has relocated the trash enclosure to be 15’ away from the principal building. q. The applicant should provide testimony regarding the lack of loading spaces. The applicant should also provide insight into the process for deliveries and pick up of goods, and the anticipated frequency of such deliveries. r. The applicant should address tire storage and removal. What happens with used tires removed from vehicles, and how are they stored and removed from the site? s. No roof plan has been provided. The applicant should confirm that no mechanical equipment on the roof would be visible from the public ROW, or from residential properties to the rear of the site. Any rooftop equipment is required to be screened. The applicant has provided a roof plan to detail the mechanical equipment on the roof. The applicant should provide testimony in regard to the visibility of such mechanical equipment and screening provided. t. A chain link fence exists in between the site and the residences to the east, which appears to be on the residential properties. The applicant may wish to consider the installation of a solid privacy fence in lieu of the chain link fence to serve as a visual barrier between the uses. The applicant has now proposed to save the existing

licant may wish to consider the installation of a solid privacy fence in lieu of the chain link fence to serve as a visual barrier between the uses. The applicant has now proposed to save the existing trees and proposed plantings along the eastern property line. A solid privacy fence in addition to these efforts may be still be warranted. The applicant has further amended the plans to include additional supplemental plantings along the eastern property line to be coordinated among the existing vegetation, which will fill in gaps in the vegetative visual screen on the property line. u. The applicant should address anticipated noise impacts from the service bays, in particular in regards to the impacts on the adjacent residential uses to the east. A noise impact report has been provided. The applicant should be prepared to discuss the methods and findings of the report with the Board. v. The applicant should address any green design measures being taken to enhance the sustainability of the project.